In the name of the people
Court of Cassation
Criminal Chamber
Wednesday Circle (D)
The author, headed by Judge / Mustafa Hassan, Vice President of the Court, and the membership of Judges / Ahmed Farhan, Ayman El-Gamal, Ahmed Radwan, Vice President of the Court, and Hazem Rashid Kilani
And the presence of the Chief Public Prosecutor at the Court of Cassation, Mr. Ahmed Abdel Wahab.
And the Secretary, Mr. / Mohamed Sami.
In the public session held at the court's headquarters in the High Court of Justice in Cairo.
On Wednesday, Dhul-Hijjah 18, 1442 AH, corresponding to July 28, 2021 AD. I issued the following ruling
1- Muhammad Badi’ Abdul-Majid Sami .
2- Muhammad Khairat Saad Abdul Latif Al-Shater .
3- Muhammad Saad Tawfiq Al-Katatni .
4- Issam El-Din Mohamed Hussein El-Arian .
5- Mohamed Mohamed Ibrahim El-Beltagy .
6- Saad Ismat Muhammad Al-Husseini .
7- Hazem Muhammad Farouk Abdul Khaleq Mansour .
8- Essam Ahmed Mahmoud Al-Haddad .
9- Mohy Hamed El-Sayed Ahmed .
10- Ayman Ali Sayed Ahmed .
11- Khaled Saad Hassanein Muhammad .
12- Ahmad Muhammad Muhammad al-Hakim .
13- Khalil Osama Muhammad Muhammad al-Aqeed .
14- Ahmed Mohamed Abdel-Aty .
15- Muhammad Fathi Rafaa al-Tahtawy .
16- Asaad Mohammed Ahmed Al Sheikha. stabbers
against
Public Prosecution. the challenge
---------
the facts
Dahrouj, 25- Ibrahim Khalil Muhammad Khalil, 26- Reda Fahmy Muhammad Khalil, 27- Kamal Al-Sayed Muhammad Ahmad, 28- Muhammad Osama Muhammad Al-Aqeed, 29- Sami Amin Hussein Al-Sayed, 30- Khalil Osama Muhammad Muhammad Muhammad Al-Aqeed (Al-Taen), 31- Ahmad Muhammad Abd al-Ati (The Plague), 32- Hussein Muhammad Mahmoud al-Qazzaz, 33- Imad al-Din Ali Atwa, 34- Ibrahim Farouk Muhammad al-Zayyat, 35 - Muhammad Fathi Rafaa al-Tahtawi (the stabber), 36- Asaad Muhammad Ahmad al-Sheikha (the stabber) in the case Felony No. 56458 of 2013, Nasr City Department, (and registered in the total table No. 2925 of 2013). That they were during the period from 2005 to August 2013 inside and outside the Arab Republic of Egypt in the Nasr City Department - Cairo Governorate .
First: - The accused from the first to the thirtieth :-
- They received media training courses to implement the agreed plan by launching rumors and psychological warfare and directing internal and external public opinion to serve their plans. With jihadist organizations inside and outside, and they are illegally infiltrated outside the country - the Gaza Strip - to receive military training in camps prepared for this, and with weapons they smuggled across the eastern and western borders of the country, and exchanged throughThe International Information Network Transfered those assignments among themselves and the leaders of the international organization, as well as data and information related to the political and economic scene in the country and popular discontent before the existing regime at the time and how to exploit the existing conditions to implement their criminal scheme. It crossed the eastern border tunnels of the country and attacked the military and police facilities and Egyptian prisons to create a state of security vacuum and chaos in the country and enabled the arrested to escape. Armed elements similar to the previous ones targeting the facilities and personnel of the armed forces and the police pushed to overthrow the Egyptian state and create a pretext for foreign intervention in the country.lands as indicated in the investigations .
Second: The accused from the thirty-first to the thirty-fourth :-
- They participated in the ways of agreement and assistance with the accused from the first to the thirtieth in committing the crime of espionage, the subject of the accusation mentioned in item First - by agreeing with them to commit it abroad and at home and helping them by providing them with e-mail addresses to be used in correspondence between them and transmitting and receiving assignments through the international information network, as well as providing them with financial support The crime was committed in accordance with this agreement and that assistance as indicated in the investigations .
Third: - Defendants from the first to the thirty-fourth as well :-
deliberately committed acts that they decree the independence, unity and territorial integrity of the country by committing the acts described in the two crimes, the subject of the two accusations contained in the first and second clauses, which resulted in spreading chaos and creating a state of security vacuum and the retreat of the forces entrusted with securing the eastern borders of the country and endangering the integrity of its lands as indicated in the investigations .
Fourth: The third, tenth, eleventh, thirty-first, thirty-fifth, and thirty-six defendants :-
1- They handed over to a foreign country and those who work in its interest and disclosed to it one of the country's defense secrets by handing over to elements of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard many secret reports received from the National Security Authority regarding confidential information related to the results of the activities of Iranian elements aimed at destabilizing the security and stability of the country as indicated in the investigations .
2- In their capacity as public servants to the President of the Republic, the Assistant to the President of the Republic for Foreign Relations and International Cooperation, the Adviser to the President of the Republic for Planning and Follow-up, the Director of the Office of the President of the Republic, and the Chief of the Office of the Presidency of the Republic, they disclosed a secret of the defense of the country by disclosing the contents of secret reports No. (344, 416, 539). , 633, 636) issued by the Presidency of the Republic and prepared for submission to the President of the Republic by sending them to the e-mail addresses indicated in the investigations .
Fifth: The accused from the first to the eighth and from the thirty-first to the thirty-fourth as well :-
They assumed leadership of a group institutionalization contrary to the provisions of the law, the purpose of which is to claim to disrupt the provisions of the constitution and laws, prevent state institutions and public authorities from carrying out their work, attack the personal freedom of citizens and public rights, and harm national unity and social peace, by taking over the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood, which aims to change the system of government by force. Attacking individuals and facilities of the armed forces and the police and targeting public facilities with the aim of disturbing public order and endangering the safety and security of society. Terrorism was one of the means used by this group to implement its purposes as indicated in the investigations. .
Sixth: The first, second, tenth, and thirty-fourth defendants as well :-
They provided a group that was founded in violation of the provisions of the law with material and financial aid by providing the group , the subject of the accusation contained in item V, with weapons and money, knowing what they were calling for and the means to achieve that in the manner indicated in the investigations. .
Seventh: The defendants from the ninth to the thirteenth, and from the fifteenth to the thirty, and the thirty-fifth and thirty-sixth as well. :-
- They joined a group that was founded in violation of the provisions of the law by joining the group - the subject of the accusation contained in item V - with their knowledge of its purposes as indicated in the investigations .
Eighth: The fifteenth, twenty-first, twenty-second, and twenty-fifth to thirty-fifth defendants :-
1- As Egyptians, they joined a terrorist organization based outside the country that uses terrorism and military training as means to achieve its purposes by joining training camps affiliated with the international Brotherhood organization and its affiliated movements and groups in the Gaza Strip and received military training there as indicated in the investigations .
2- They infiltrated the country through its eastern borders illegally by infiltrating through the tunnels prepared for that as indicated in the investigations. .
She referred them to the Cairo Criminal Court to punish them according to the record and description contained in the referral order .
Doaa Muhammad Rashad, the wife of the officer/ Muhammad al-Jawhari, claimed a civilian before the defendants in the amount of one hundred thousand pounds and one for the temporary compensation of the civilian .
The aforementioned court ruled on the session of June 16, 2015 pursuant to Articles 2/first, second item A, 40/second, third, 41/1, 77, 80, 80b, 83a/1, 85/1, 4, 85a / A, B, 86, 86 bis/1, 2, 86 bis A/1, 2, 86 bis/c, 86 bis/d of the Penal Code, and Article 2/2 of Presidential Decree No. 298 of 1995 regarding securing the eastern borders For the Arab Republic of Egypt, with the implementation of the text of Articles 17, 30/1, 32 of the same law .
first in attendance :-
1- By unanimous opinion, punishing each of the accused, Muhammad Khairat Saad Abdul Latif Al-Shater, Muhammad Muhammad Ibrahim Al-Beltagy, and Ahmed Muhammad Muhammad Abd Al-Ati, by hanging for what was attributed to each of them. .
2- And with the punishment of each of the accused: Muhammad Badi' Abd al-Majid Sami, Muhammad Muhammad Morsi Issa al-Ayat, Muhammad Saad Tawfiq al-Katatni, Issam al-Din Muhammad Hussein al-Arian, Saad Esmat Muhammad al -Husseini, Hazem Muhammad Farouk Abd al-Khaleq Mansour, Essam Ahmad Mahmoud al-Haddad, Mohi Hamed Muhammad Mr. Ahmed, Ayman Ali Sayed Ahmed, Safwa Hamouda Hegazy Ramadan, Khaled Saad Hassanein Mohamed, Jihad Essam Ahmed Mahmoud El-Haddad, Eid Mohamed Ismail Dahrouj, Ibrahim Khalil Mohamed Khalil El-Darawy, Kamal El-Sayed Mohamed Sayed Ahmed, Sami Amin Hussein El -Sayed, Khalil Osama Mohamed The colonel was sentenced to life imprisonment for what was assigned to each of them .
3- And with the punishment of each of the accused / Muhammad Fathi Rafa' al-Tahtawi, and Asa'ad Muhammad Ahmad al-Sheikha, with imprisonment for seven years for what was assigned to each of them .
Second: In absentia :-
By unanimous opinion, to punish the accused, Mr. Mahmoud Ezzat Ibrahim Issa, Metwally Salah El-Din Abdel-Maqsoud Metwally, Ammar Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Fayed Al-Banna, Ahmed Rajab Rajab Suleiman, Al-Hassan Mohamed Khairat Al-Shater, Sundus Asim Sayed Shalabi, Abu Bakr Hamdi Kamal Mashali, and Ahmed Mohamed Muhammad al-Hakim, Reda Fahmy Muhammad Khalil, Muhammad Osama Muhammad al-Aqeed, Hussain Muhammad Mahmud al-Qazzaz, Imad al-Din Ali Atwa Shaheen, and Ibrahim Farouk Muhammad al-Zayat to death by hanging for what was attributed to each of them .
Third: With the expiration of the criminal case for the accused / Farid Ismail Abdel Halim Khalil, with his death to the mercy of God Almighty .
Fourth: To confiscate the seized items and to compel the convicts to pay criminal expenses .
Fifth: - In the civil lawsuit filed by Doaa Muhammad Rashad for not accepting it to be filed by a non-qualified person and obligating her to pay her expenses and two hundred pounds in return for attorney fees .
The convicts were stabbed: Muhammad Badi' Abd al-Majid Sami, Muhammad Khairat Saad Abd al-Latif al-Shater, Muhammad Morsi Issa al-Ayat, Muhammad Saad Tawfiq al-Katatni, Issam al-Din Muhammad Hussein al-Arian, Muhammad Muhammad Ibrahim al-Beltagy, Saad Esmat Muhammad al-Husseini, Hazem Muhammad Farouk Abd al-Khaleq Mansour Issam Ahmed Mahmoud El-Haddad, Mohi Hamed Mohamed El-Sayed Ahmed, Ayman Ali Syed Ahmed, Safwa Hamouda Hegazy Ramadan, Khaled Saad Hussein Mohamed, Jihad Essam Ahmed Mahmoud El-Haddad, Eid Mohamed Ismail Dahrouj, Ibrahim Khalil Mohamed Khalil El-Darawy, Kamal El-Sayed Mohamed Sayed Ahmed, Sami Amin Hussein al-Sayed, Khalil Osama Muhammad Muhammad al-Aqeed, Ahmad Muhammad Abd al -Ati, Muhammad Fathi Rafa' al-Tahtawi, Asaad Muhammad Ahmad al-Sheikha in this judgment by way of cassation .
Their appeal was registered in the Court of Cassation's schedule No. 50733 of Judicial Year 85 .
And the Court of Cassation ruled in the session of November 22, 2016. First: to accept the Public Prosecution's presentation of the case, and secondly: to accept the convicts' appeal in form and in the matter to annul the contested judgment and return the case to the Cairo Criminal Court for a new ruling by another circuit .
The convict / Ahmed Muhammad Muhammad Al-Hakim repeated the procedures in the judgment in absentia issued against him .
And the Court of Return (Cairo Criminal Court) ruled on September 11, 2019 pursuant to Articles 2 / First, Second Clause A, 40 / Second, Third, 41 / 1, 77, 83 A / 1, 85 A / A, D , 86, 86 bis 1, 2, 86 bis A/1, 2, 86 bis c, 86 bis d of the Penal Code, and Article 2/2 of Presidential Decree No. 298 of 1995 regarding securing the eastern borders of the Arab Republic of Egypt. With the implementation of Articles 17, 30, 32/2 of the Penal Code .
First: To punish each of the accused :-
1- Muhammad Badi' Abdel-Majid Sami (the first with the referral order), 2- Muhammad Khairat Saad Abdul-Latif Al-Shater (the second by the referral order), 3- Muhammad Saad Tawfiq Al-Katatni (the fourth by the referral order), 4- Essam El-Din Muhammad Hussein Al-Arian (the fifth by the referral order) ), 5- Muhammad Muhammad Ibrahim al-Beltagy (seventh by order of referral), 6- Saad Ismat Muhammad al-Husseini (eighth by order of referral), 7- Hazem Muhammad Farouk Abdel-Khaleq Mansour (ninth by referral order), 8- Mohi Hamed Al-Sayed Ahmed (eleventh by order). Referral), 9- Khaled Saad Hassanein Muhammad (sixteenth by referral order), 10- Khalil Osama Muhammad Muhammad al-Aqeed (thirtieth by referral order), 11- Ahmed Muhammad Abd al-Ati (31st by referral order), ).
Life imprisonment for the assigned to the first accused, Muhammad Badi' Abdul Majeed Sami, first, communicating with those who work for an organization based outside the country, thirdly committing acts that destroy the country's independence, and sixth, providing a terrorist group with material aid. .
And what was attributed to the second accused, Muhammad Khairat Saad Abdul Latif Al-Shater, in the articles of indictment: First, communicating with those who worked for the benefit of an organization based outside the country, thirdly committing acts that the country's independence , and fifth, assuming leadership in a terrorist group. .
And what was assigned to the fourth accused, Muhammad Saad Tawfiq Al-Katatni, in the articles of accusation: firstly, communicating with those who worked for the benefit of an organization based outside the country, thirdly, committing acts that harm the country's independence, and fifth, assuming leadership of a terrorist group. .
And what was assigned to the fifth accused / Essam El-Din Muhammad Hussein Al-Arian in the articles of accusation: firstly, communicating with those who worked for the benefit of an organization based outside the country, and thirdly, committing acts that would prejudice the country's independence, and fifth, assuming leadership in a terrorist group. .
And what was assigned to the seventh accused, Muhammad Muhammad Ibrahim al-Beltagy, in the articles of the accusation: first, communicating with those who worked for the benefit of an organization based outside the country, thirdly committing acts that shame the country's independence, and fifth, assuming leadership in a terrorist group .
And what was attributed to the eighth accused, Saad Ismat Muhammad Al-Husseini, in the articles of indictment: first, communicating with those who worked for the benefit of an organization based outside the country, and thirdly committing acts that committed the country's independence .
And what was assigned to the ninth defendant, Hazem Muhammad Farouk Abdul-Khaleq Mansour, in the articles of indictment: firstly, communicating with those who work for an organization based outside the country, thirdly, committing acts that affect the country's independence, and seventh , joining a terrorist group. .
And what was attributed to the eleventh accused, Mohi Hamed Muhammad Al-Sayed Ahmed, in the articles of indictment: first, communicating with those who worked for an organization based outside the country, thirdly committing acts that general the country's independence, and seventh, joining a terrorist group .
And what was assigned to the sixteenth defendant, Khaled Saad Hassanein Muhammad, in the accusation clause, thirdly, committing acts that undermine the country’s independence, and seventh, joining a terrorist group. .
And what was assigned to the 30th defendant, Khalil Osama Muhammad Muhammad Abd al-Ati, in the articles of indictment: Third, committing acts that undermine the country’s independence, seventh, joining a terrorist group, and eighth, joining a terrorist organization based outside the country. .
And what was attributed to the thirty-first accused / Ahmed Mohamed Abdel-Aty in the accusation clause, secondly, participation in espionage, and thirdly, committing acts that undermine the independence of the country. .
Second: To punish each of the accused :-
1- Essam Ahmed Mahmoud Al-Haddad (tenth in the referral order), 2- Ayman Ali Sayed Ahmed (the thirteenth in the referral order), 3- Ahmed Muhammad Muhammad Al-Hakim (the 22nd in the referral order) with a ten-year hard prison sentence for what was assigned to them in the seventh indictment .
Third: To punish each of the accused :-
1- Muhammad Fathi Rafa’a Al-Tahtawi (the thirty-fifth of the referral order), 2- As’ad Muhammad Ahmed Al-Sheikha (the thirty-sixth according to the referral order) to seven years’ imprisonment for what was attributed to them in the seventh indictment .
Fourth: the innocence of each :-
1- Safwa Hamouda Hijazi Ramadan (the fourteenth by the referral order), 2- Al-Hassan Muhammad Khairat Saad Abdel-Latif (the eighteenth by the referral order), 3- Eid Muhammad Ismail Dahrouj (the twenty-fourth by the referral order), 4- Ibrahim Khalil Muhammad Khalil Al-Darawi (fifth). The twenty-seventh by the referral order), 5- Kamal Al-Sayyid Muhammad Sayed Ahmed (the twenty-seventh by the referral order), 6- Sami Amin Hussein Al-Sayed (the twenty-ninth by the referral order). What is attributed to them? .
Fifth: the innocence of each :-
1- Muhammad Khairat Saad Abd al-Latif al-Shater (second in the referral order), which was attributed to him in the indictment. Sixth, providing material and financial aid to a terrorist group, 2- Essam Ahmed Mahmoud al-Haddad (tenth under the referral order), which was attributed to him in the indictment. First, communicating with those who work for an organization based in outside the country, thirdly, committing acts that undermine the country’s independence, fourthly disclosing one of the country’s defense secrets, and sixthly providing financial aid to a terrorist group. .
3- Hamed al-Sayyid Ahmed (the eleventh in the referral order) erased what was attributed to him in the accusation clause Fourth Disclosure of a secret of the defense of the country, 4- Ayman Ali Sayed Ahmed (the thirteenth in the referral order) from what was attributed to him under the accusation clauses The country, and thirdly, committing acts that undermine the independence of the country, 5- Khaled Saad Hassanein Muhammad (sixteenth in the referral order), which was attributed to him in the accusation clause first, communicating with those who work for an organization based outside the country, 6- Jihad Essam Ahmed Mahmoud Al-Haddad (nineteenth). In the referral order) for what was attributed to him in the two articles of accusation, firstly communicating with those who work for the benefit of an organization based outside the country, and thirdly committing acts that undermine the independence of the country, 7- Ahmed Muhammad Muhammad Muhammad Al-Hakim (the twenty-second of the referral order, re-proceedings) of what was attributed to him in the articles of accusation first Communication with those who work for the benefit of an organization based outside the country, and thirdly, committing acts that undermine the country’s independence, andEighth: Joining a foreign organization outside the country, 8- Khalil Osama Muhammad Muhammad al-Aqeed (the thirty-first by the referral order) regarding what was attributed to him in the accusation clause. Fourth indictment: Disclosure of one of the country’s defense secrets, 10- Muhammad Fathi Refa’a Al-Tahtawi (the thirty-fifth of the referral order) of what was attributed to him in the accusation clause Fourth: Disclosing the country’s secrets and handing them over to a foreign country, 11- Asaad Muhammad Ahmed Al-Sheikha (the thirty-sixth of the referral order) about what was attributed to him Fourth, to him with the accusation clause: Disclosing the country’s secrets and handing them over to a foreign countryDisclosure of one of the country's defense secrets, 10- Muhammad Fathi Rafa'a Al-Tahtawi (the thirty-fifth of the referral order) of what was attributed to him in the accusation clause Fourth Disclosure of the country's secrets and handing them over to a foreign country, 11- Asaad Muhammad Ahmed Al-Sheikha (the thirty-sixth of the referral order) about what was attributed to him in the accusation clause Fourth: Disclosing the country's secrets and handing them over to a foreign countryDisclosure of one of the country's defense secrets, 10- Muhammad Fathi Rafa'a Al-Tahtawi (the thirty-fifth of the referral order) of what was attributed to him in the accusation clause Fourth Disclosure of the country's secrets and handing them over to a foreign country, 11- Asaad Muhammad Ahmed Al-Sheikha (the thirty-sixth of the referral order) about what was attributed to him in the accusation clause Fourth: Disclosing the country's secrets and handing them over to a foreign country .
Sixth: The inadmissibility of considering the criminal case against the defendants / Muhammad Badi' Abdul Majeed Sami, and Saad Esmat Muhammad al-Husseini for item Fifth: Assuming leadership in a terrorist group, and the accused, Jihad Essam Ahmed Mahmoud al-Haddad for item VII, joining a group founded in violation of the provisions of the law for the previous adjudication in Case No. 2210 of 2014 Agouza Department. And the inadmissibility of hearing the criminal case against the accused, Ahmed Muhammad Muhammad Abd al-Ati (the thirty-first) with regard to item V. Assuming leadership of a terrorist group for a previous ruling in Case No. 10154 of 2014 Felonies of the second of October .
Seventh: To confiscate the seized mobile phones and place them at the disposal of the General Intelligence .
Eighth: Obligation of convicts to pay criminal expenses .
Ninth: - With regard to the civil case: the inadmissibility of claiming a civil right filed by / Essam Omar Muhammad Qandil, Najat Abdel-Wahhab Darwish Hassanein, Sherif Mahmoud Mustafa Mahmoud, Sameh Ahmed Saleh Saeed, Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamed Mansour, Khaled Al-Senussi Ahmed Ahmed Al-Khadrawi, and Abdullah Abdullah Al-Mohsen Mahmoud, Mr. Muhammad Al-Sayyid Al-Metwally Al-Sharif, Khaled Mahmoud Hussein Metwally, Abdul-Muttalib Eid Mustafa Abu Shusha, Muhammad Farghali Muhammad Farghali, Muhammad Ahmed Badr, Karim Mustafa Muhammad Rushdi, Khaled Zaki Al-Azab, Ahmed Muhammad Maghazi Ahmed, Athar Ibrahim Ali, and Ashraf Abd Al-Moneim Abdel-Salam, Mohamed Abdel-Azim Abdel-Qawi Al-Shafei, Ahmed Saber Abdel-Sabour Zayan, Mohamed Mohamed Abdel-Aziz Al-Sayed Khalil, Ibrahim Mohamed Amr Ibrahim, Hussein Abdel-Rahman Hussein, Ashraf Hassan Abdel-Ghani Mohamed and obligated them to pay the civil lawsuit expenses and two hundred pounds for attorney fees .
Tenth: With regard to the deceased to the mercy of his master / Muhammad Muhammad Morsi Issa Al-Ayyat (third by order of referral) and pursuant to the provision of Article Fourteen of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the court shall rule the expiration of the criminal case before him due to his death. .
The convicts, Muhammad Badi’ Abd al-Majid Sami, Muhammad Saad Tawfiq al-Katatni, and Mohy Hamid Muhammad al-Sayed, appealed this ruling by way of cassation on October 14, 2019. .
The convicts were stabbed: Muhammad Khairat Saad Abdul Latif al-Shater, Issam al-Din Muhammad Hussein al-Arian, Muhammad Muhammad Ibrahim al-Beltagy, Saad Esmat Muhammad al-Hussaini, Hazem Muhammad Farouk Abd al-Khaleq Mansour, Khaled Saad Hassanein Muhammad, Khalil Osama Muhammad Muhammad al-Aqeed, and Ahmed Muhammad Abd al-Ati. Ayman Ali Sayed Ahmed, Ahmed Muhammad Muhammad al-Hakim, Muhammad Fathi Rafaa al-Tahtawi, and Asaad Muhammad Ahmad al-Sheikha in this judgment by way of cassation on November 2, 2019 .
Ms. ...... the lawyer, in her capacity as the representative of the convict, Muhammad Fathi Rafaa al-Tahtawi, appealed this ruling by way of cassation on November 6, 2019 .
Mr. ...... the lawyer, in his capacity as an attorney for the convict, Essam Ahmed Mahmoud Al-Haddad, appealed this ruling by way of cassation on November 6, 2019 .
Mr. … the lawyer, in his capacity as an attorney for the convicted person, Essam Ahmed Mahmoud Al-Haddad, appealed this ruling by way of cassation on November 9, 2019
Two memoranda of reasons for appealing in cassation were filed on November 6, 2019, the first for the convict/ Muhammad Fathi Rafa'a Al-Tahtawi, signed by Ms./ …… and the second for the convict/ Essam Ahmed Mahmoud Al- Haddad, signed by Mr./ ...... Lawyer .
Three memoranda of reasons for appeal in cassation were filed on November 9, 2019, the first of the convict / Ayman Ali Sayed Ahmed, signed by Mr. / ......lawyer .
And each of the second and third memoranda of all convicts signed by Mr. / ...... the lawyer .
---------------
court
After reviewing the papers, and hearing the report, which was read by the judge, the rapporteur, the pleading, and after deliberation .
First: - Insofar as the appeal of all the convicts fulfilled the legally prescribed form
Second: On the appeal filed by the fourth appellant, Issam Al-Din Muhammad Husayn Al-Arian.
Since it was shown by the court's review of the judgment issued in the appeal No. 17324 of 89 BC at the session of June 14, 2021 that the appellant died after the appeal report and the filing of the reasons on time, and then the criminal case must be terminated for his death pursuant to Article 14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure .
Third: On the one referred to by the rest of the appellants.
and violation of the right of defense if the fact of the case was not sufficiently explained It fulfills the elements of the crimes in which he accused them and the circumstances in which they took place, and he did not mention the performer of the evidence released in his judgment. It has relied upon it in convicting them, and supports in convicting the second, third, fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth appellants by communicating to a conference held in Qatar on 01/10/2014 entitled Islamic-American Dialogue and to several phone calls received for the third defendant from Turkey during the period from 20 to 27 January 2011 without a statement performed, and the judgment was rejected without justification for defensesThe fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth appellants of the unconstitutionality of the decision by Law No. 89 of 2012 granting a blanket amnesty for some crimes committed during the January 25 revolution, as it included limiting its application to a specific period of time before a body and in a certain way, and the unconstitutionality of Articles 9 and 46 of the General Intelligence Law No. 100 of the year 1971 regarding the inadmissibility of General Intelligence personnel providing information about their work except with the written approval of the head of the General Intelligence Service and the invalidity of the permission issued by the investigative judge to delegate the head of the authority to assign a specialist to examine, inspect and unload the electronic accounts owned by the plaintiffs and the evidence generated by it due to their lack of valid period and their presence on the premises It is not specified or identifiable in violation of the provisions of Articles 57 of the Constitution and Article 95 of The Code of Procedure, in addition to that it is considered as investigation work that is carried out only by judicial officers and inspection work that is carried out only by the investigative judge or his representative from among the members of the Public ProsecutionIt is not an act of expertise, as the ruling went in its response to that plea, despite the eighth, tenth and twelfth appellants' insistence on appointing a committee of specialized experts to investigate their defense in this regard. The head of the National Security Authority concluded, because the editor of the national security investigation report exceeded the limits Assignment decision and the fact that the person who did it is one of the secret sources and the impossibility of entering this e-mail with the alleged password and the inadmissibility of considering the case for the second appellant for the crime of assuming leadership in a terrorist group for a previous adjudication of cases No. It became final by ratifying it, contrary to what the court decided, and that its conviction that he will assume a new leadership after his release in that case is a corruption of reasoning for not specifying the time range of both cases and the invalidity of the evidence derived from the attachments extracted from the cases No. 500 of 2008, 1414 of the year2008, 404 for the year 2009, 237 for the year 2009, 909 for the year 2010, Limiting the security of a supreme state to the principle of the fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth appellants for not joining these lawsuits and because an order had previously been issued that there was no reason to file a lawsuit against them, as well as what the ninth appellant showed about the lack of seriousness of investigations and their violation of the truth and reality and his dispute What it included in his membership in the Guidance Office, which held several meetings during 2010 to approve the events of chaos because he was arrested during that period, and what the eighth and tenth appellant maintained that the Muslim Brotherhood was established and registered under No. 642 of 2012 at the Ministry of Social Solidarity and was not Joining it is a criminal, and that the inclusion of this group in the lists of terrorist entities under Law 8 of 2015 does not apply retroactively to the eighth appellant, because he was arrested before the entry into force of this law and for their payment and the fifteenth appellant's plea for the invalidity of their arrest and search without permission and in cases other than flagrante delicto. Judgment by the appellantsThe eighth and tenth are documents indicative of the correctness of that plea and paying attention to what the eighth appellant insisted on hearing his daughter's testimony in this regard. Presenting a defense to it, and the tenth appellant's refutation of not belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the fifteenth appellant's refutation of the invalidity of his detention in a military area for violating the Constitution and the Prisons Organization Law, and the absence of papers from Interior Minister's Decision No. 776 of 2013 to establish a special prison in the Abu Qir region, turning to his request to achieve this through Including the books that include the entry of the Naval Unit prison in Abu Qir and the entry of the Burj Al Arab prison and the invalidity of his arrest and the continuation of his detention pending case No. 921 of 2013 for the escape from Wadi al-Natrun prison despite his exclusion from it and without a legal basis and his failure to renew it on time. Despite what he decidedThe third appellant in the investigations asserted that he does not belong to the Muslim Brotherhood and that the investigations did not indicate his joining it, and that the court had punished him with the same penalty previously imposed on him when he was tried the first time, despite his acquittal of the crime of disclosing secrets. The case may be considered because an order has already been issued by the Public Prosecution that there is no reason to file a criminal case in Case No. 921 of 2013, the Public Prosecutor's communications, As well as the authenticity of the photocopy submitted by Captain / Muhammad Afifi regarding the so-called hot groups when responding to the thirteenth appellant's plea regarding them, that they have no effect on the formation of the court's doctrine and did not rely on it and Then rely on it in the conviction again, as relied on in Convicting them of national security and national security investigations alone, even though they do not serve as evidence of conviction by themselves, and he embraced a picture of her accompanied by purely personal and political opinions that had an impact on his judgment and foretells that the court was overpowered by the desire to condemn, and that the court had previously expressed an opinion in the case by ruling in felony No. 6187 for the year 2012 10154 for the year 2014 the second of October and the attached felony No. 56460 for the year 2013 felonies of the first section of Al-Arish, including the judgment issued by a body that lost its authority, and it also included this felony in the case of simple association and issued an independent judgment and did not respond to the request of the sixth appellant Include it with the link that does not acceptfragmentation, and the judgment relied on the statements of the first and seventh appellants in the investigations, although they were not a text in the perpetration of the incident, and it was inferred by suspicion and assumption that the seventh appellant joined the Freedom and Justice Party, evidence of his joining the Muslim Brotherhood. indicates that the leadership of the countries is the one who adheres to the decision of the general guide and the guidance office as well asThat this is the result of arbitrary assumptions.In convicting the seventh appellant, he relied on what was reported in the investigations about his travel and meeting with people affiliated with Hamas and receiving two letters from those claiming Ayman Taha, although the papers did not mention any e-mail attributed to the appellant that had been emptied. And on his visit to the headquarters of the Arab Doctors Union in the Medical Syndicate with a delegation from the Palestinian Hamas movement, and the closed conversation that took place between them without other evidence to support what was included in those investigations, 2009 was proven false by the testimony of the movements he submitted to the court, and the court also arbitrarily extracted the significance of the three phone calls that took place between the third defendant and the fourteenth appellant, which were It was transcribed with the knowledge of lt. Col. Muhammad Mabrouk in convicting the fourteenth appellant of espionage and its words deviated from their meaning without being authorized to transcribe them or listen to them. Convincing evidence of that, and he convicted the eighth, tenth, twelfth, fifteenth and sixteenth simply appellants of the crime of joining a terrorist group based on the assumption that they knew and joined the Muslim Brotherhood because they worked in the Presidency of the Republic and knew some of the people whose affiliation with that group was rumored. The sixth appellant on what was included in the national security investigations about his travel to Turkey during 2009 to attend the meetings of the Higher Committee of the Union of Student Organizations and the Palestine Support Committee, despite his testimony of movements proving that he did not leave the country that year. The eighth, tenth, twelfth, fifteenth, and sixteenth, despite the unity of the acts ascribed to them and their implementation of Article 17 of the Penal Code against him, all of which defects the judgment and requires its rescission.The judgment is flawed and must be overturnedThe judgment is flawed and must be overturned .
From the region in which the General Guide (Egypt) resides, and five members, taking into account in their selection: regional representation. As for the General Shura Council, it is the authority of the group and its decisions are binding. It consists of at least thirty members representing Brotherhood organizations approved in various countries. The regulation established a tight system that defines the relationship between the general leadership of the group and the leaders of the countries according to three circles, the first, in which the leaders of the countries must abide by the decisions of the general leadership, represented by the virtue of the General Guide, the Office of General Guidance and the General Shura Council, and the second circle:It is one of the things that fall under the first circle that must be adhered to regional representation. As for the General Shura Council, it is the authority of the group and its decisions are binding. It consists of at least thirty members who represent the Brotherhood organizations approved in various countries. The countries abide by the decisions of the general leadership, represented by the virtue of the General Guide, the Office of General Guidance and the General Shura Council, and the second circle: is the one in which the leaders of the countries must consult and agree with the general guide or the general guidance office before making a decision, and the third circle: is the one in which the leaders of the countries act freely Complete, then learn the General Counseling Office.It is one of the things that fall under the first circle that must be adhered to regional representation. As for the General Shura Council, it is the authority of the group and its decisions are binding. It consists of at least thirty members who represent the Brotherhood organizations approved in various countries. The countries abide by the decisions of the general leadership, represented by the virtue of the General Guide, the Office of General Guidance and the General Shura Council, and the second circle: is the one in which the leaders of the countries must consult and agree with the general guide or the general guidance office before making a decision, and the third circle: is the one in which the leaders of the countries act freely Complete, then learn the General Counseling Office.It is one of the things that fall under the first circle that must be adhered to It is in which the leaders of the countries act with complete freedom, and then the General Guidance Office learns. It is one of the things that fall under the first circle that must be adhered to It is in which the leaders of the countries act with complete freedom, and then the General Guidance Office learns. It is one of the things that fall under the first circle that must be adhered to :-
A- Adherence to the basic principles contained in these regulations, and adherence to the curriculum approved by the General Shura Council .
b- Commitment to the community's understanding of Islam that is derived from the Qur'an and the Sunnah and which is set out in the Twenty Principles .
C- Commitment to the group's policies and positions towards public issues as determined by the General Guidance Office and the General Shura Council .
D- Obligation to obtain the approval of the General Guidance Office before taking any important political decision .
It was stipulated in the global list that the Muslim Brotherhood is a comprehensive Islamic body that works to establish the religion of God on earth, achieve the purposes for which Islam came, and set goals for itself that enable it to capture people’s hearts and minds represented in working to raise the standard of living for individuals and develop wealth The nation and its protection, achieving social justice and social security for every citizen, fighting ignorance, disease and poverty, and encouraging good and charitable works. However, the main goal that the group has been seeking since its inception and has been covering with the veil of religion and deceptive claim that it is a preaching group is to seize the rule of the country and establish the Islamic state, which is to achieve it There is nothing wrong with allying with whomever it can seek, even if their beliefs and beliefs differ, as long as their interests agree towards one goal, which is the overthrow of the Egyptian state in preparation for the establishment of the rightly-guided Islamic state. They have no roomThe homeland in its geographical sense, rather the lesson and the basis for what they called the Islamic homeland, one of the most important goals of the group that were expressly stipulated in the global list of the Muslim Brotherhood is the liberation of the Islamic homeland in all its parts from everything that is not Islamic, and the gathering of Muslims until they become one nation, and the establishment of the Islamic state Which implement the provisions of Islam and its teachings in practice, but it is the Islam of the group according to their understanding of it, which is derived from the Qur’an and the Sunnah and which is clarified in the twenty principles. (a from the International List) so they made themselves guardians, not of Islam, but rather of their concept of Islam, which is not accepted by others to discuss it or argue about it so that they see it according to their whims and desires, and that the group, while on the way to achieving its desired goal, did not hold fast to the path of wisdom and good exhortation that God Almighty commanded us to adhere to. Rather, it sought the help of that to prepare the nationA jihadist united front to stand against those they called the invaders and authoritarian enemies of God, bearing in mind the goal of establishing the rightly-guided Islamic state, liberating the Islamic homeland, and uniting Muslims so that they become one nation (Article 2/e of the Global List). Inwardly there is torment before him, as this loose text, which is devoid of a criterion for defining who are the invaders and authoritarians from among the enemies of God, opens the door wide for the group’s leaders to intimidate and harm whomever they want. They point to them with the fingers of falsehood and bring them down to the status of invaders or rulers from among the enemies of God, so it falls upon them to say without opposition or discussion from those who are obligated to listen and obey. The words of the misguided - wielding the swords of jihad in their faces on the deceptive claim that they are implementing ShariaGod, and that is the clear error, and since the dream of the Islamic state that they aspire to be achieved only with the demise of the existing system in the country, which represents a stumbling block before them, since its establishment depends on the annihilation of the state and building on its ruins, there is no way for that except by shaking the pillars of the state and its solid pillars through spreading chaos In the country, this was the mainstay of their plan, as the threads of the Brotherhood conspiracy with the US administration began in 2005, following the announcement by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice about the chaos of the caliphate and the new Middle East, which coincided with the desire of the international Brotherhood organization to control the government in coordination with Hamas This was followed by the statement of Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State during her visit to the country in June 2005, during which she indicated that the fear of the arrival of Islamic currents to power should not be an obstacle to political reforms in the region.Al Arabiya, where the implementation of that scheme began by exploiting the state of popular discontent and anger against the existing regime at the time and monitoring the outcome of the events to intervene in a timely manner to create a state of chaos through the assistance of the elements of Hamas and the Lebanese Hezbollah, in addition to the Brotherhood elements that had previously been trained in the Gaza Strip with the knowledge of the movement Hamas, and they used this to call Muhammad Badi’ Abdul Majeed Sami (the first accused), Muhammad Khairat Saad Abdul Latif Al-Shater (the second accused), Muhammad Saad Tawfiq Al-Katatni (the fourth accused), Issam Al-Din Muhammad Hussein Al-Arian (the fifth accused), and Muhammad Muhammad Ibrahim al-Beltagy (the seventh defendant), Saad Esmat Muhammad al-Husseini (the eighth defendant), Hazem Muhammad Farouk (the ninth defendant), and Mohi Hamed Muhammad al-Sayed (the eleventh defendant) with those who work for an organization based outside the country - the international Brotherhood organization and its military wing, the Resistance Movement Islamic Hamas - to carry out terrorist acts inside the Arab Republic of Egypt, as HamasIt is a resistance movement, and it is part of the State of Palestine and the governing authorities in it, and it is a group that has an organization, leadership, and a president that organizes and plans it, and it bears arms openly and has its characteristics that distinguish it. Thirty) and others have already been sentenced (the thirty-second to the thirty-fourth defendant) for cooperating with them in carrying out terrorist acts inside the country and against its property, institutions, employees and citizens, and their way in that was to open channels of communication with official and unofficial foreign bodies to gain their support for that through several travels. It was carried out by members of the group. On January 10, 2004, the Brotherhood, Judge Hussein Ahmed (Emir of the Islamic Group in Pakistan), and Yusuf al-Qaradawi participated in a conference held in Qatar under the title of American Islamic Dialogue under the auspices of the American Brookings Institution in coordination with the Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs, attended by former President Bill Clinton. And that within the framework of the Brotherhood organization’s efforts to findLinks with Islamic movements, foreign ruling regimes, bodies and associations abroad. The accused, Muhammad Saad al-Katatni, and Saad Esmat al-Husseini fourth and eighth were dispatched with an order to refer to Turkey to participate in the meeting of the Global Guidance Office, which was held in Istanbul, Turkey, from 6/30 to 2/ 7/2007, where they raised many topics that revolved around the internal situation of the Brotherhood in Egypt and its relationship to the existing regime in the country and the activities of the Brotherhood’s parliamentary bloc in the People’s Assembly, as well as the dispatch of Muhammad Saad al-Katatni, Saad Esmat al-Husseini and others to participate in the meeting of the Shura Council of the International Organization in its session (30). ), which was held in Turkey on 12/11/2007 and concluded with recommendations, the most important of which is the search for the establishment of a satellite channel for the Muslim Brotherhood and the assignment of a committee to study that matter. On 9/21/2009 over the course ofTwo days led by the leader Ibrahim Munir Ahmed Mustafa, Secretary-General of the international organization of the group (resident in England) and the participation of representatives from the wings of the international organization in countries (Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Sultanate of Oman, Kuwait, Europe, Algeria, Yemen, Central Asia, North Caucasus), and also traveled Saad Esmat Al-Husseini (the eighth accused) to Turkey to participate in the meeting of the Higher Committee of the Union of Student Organizations, which was held from 5 to 7/1/2007 with the participation of others, during which the previous work plan was reviewed in various countries and discussed expanding the circle of polarization among student elements, after which Saad Al-Husseini participated in the meeting of the Palestine Support Committee, which was held in Istanbul, Turkey, on 8/1/2009, and took advantage of his presence in Turkey to hold a meeting with an official of the Palestinian Hamas movement nicknamed Abu Omar. Its success in the 2009 parliamentary elections, and Mohamed Mohamed El-Beltagy (the seventh accused) was also dispatched.To the Turkish city of Istanbul under the pretense of participating in the conference in support of Gaza, which was held on 22-23/5/2009, and using that conference to hold an organizational meeting with members of the Shura Council of the Palestinian movement Hamas, who assured him during the meeting of the following: .... that the members of the movement Hamas gave the pledge of allegiance to the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood in the country and that they are committed to the program and platform of the Brotherhood....Belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood is one of the basic conditions for joining the Al-Qassam Brigades....The path to jihad work must be preceded by engaging in advocacy and educational work in accordance with the Brotherhood's curriculum. .... Al-Beltagy also held individual meetings with some of the organization's leaders, who are:That the members of the Hamas movement have pledged allegiance to the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood in the country and that they are committed to the program and platform of the Brotherhood....Belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood is one of the basic conditions for joining the Al-Qassam Brigades....that the path to jihad work must be preceded by engaging in advocacy and educational work in accordance with For the Brotherhood's platform....Al-Beltagy also held individual meetings with some of the organization's leaders, who are:That the members of the Hamas movement have pledged allegiance to the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood in the country and that they are committed to the program and platform of the Brotherhood....Belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood is one of the basic conditions for joining the Al-Qassam Brigades....that the path to jihad work must be preceded by engaging in advocacy and educational work in accordance with For the Brotherhood's platform....Al-Beltagy also held individual meetings with some of the organization's leaders, who are: :-
1-Brother Ibrahim Munir with the aim of identifying the developments of the case 404/2009 limiting the security of a supreme state and the latter accused .
2 The Pakistani Brotherhood's Abdul Ghaffar Aziz is responsible for the foreign relations of the Islamic Group in Pakistan .
3 - The Tunisian Brotherhood, Rashid Ghannouchi, the observer of the Brotherhood in Tunisia .
The Moroccan Brotherhood, Chakiba bin Makhlouf, head of the Federation of Islamic Organizations in Europe, during which the accusations leveled against him in Case 404/2009 Limiting the Security of a Supreme State were reviewed. .
4- The Lebanese Brotherhood, Ibrahim Naji Al-Masry, responsible for the media movement in the international organization of the Brotherhood .
Hazem Muhammad Farouk Mansour (the ninth defendant) also went to attend the meetings of the Beirut International Forum for Resistance and Anti-Imperialism, which was held from the 19th of December:February 16, 2009, during which he met with the Palestinian, nicknamed Abu Hisham, the official of the committees of the Hamas movement in the State of Palestine. Hamas is ready to provide the necessary support to the group if a decision is taken to overthrow the regime and seize power, and the Palestinian added that there is coordination between Hamas and the Lebanese Hezbollah with regard to military training and that the person responsible for this is Imad Mughniyeh (and then he was assassinated in Syria), and the accused confirmed Hazem Farouk agreed in full with the aforementioned Palestinian proposal, Stressing that the overthrow of the Egyptian regime has been proposed to the group's leadership, and that the group is currently trying to convince the rest of the political forces and currents present in the country to do so. Also, a delegation of Brotherhood elements went to the Lebanese capital Beirut in response to the invitation that was sentTo them in the Arab International Forum to Support the Resistance, which was held on the 17th: January 15, 2010. Din Abdel-Maqsoud (previously convicted in absentia), Mohamed Saad Al-Katatni (the fourth defendant), Hazem Mohamed Farouk (the ninth defendant), Hussein Mohamed Ibrahim Hussein, Mohamed Mohamed El-Beltagy (the seventh defendant), and Ibrahim Ibrahim Abu Auf Youssef and Osama Saad Hassan Jado, where the Palestinian Muhammad Nazzal (a member of the Hamas political bureau) held a meeting with the delegation during which he inquired about the group's conditions after Muhammad Badi' assumed the position of guide, and inquired about the internal situation in Egypt and the future of the existing regime, and the group's ability to destabilize stability in the event of a decision to take to the street, and the extent of the size and transfer of Defense Minister Hussein Tantawi and the political influence of businessmen and the strength of their influence. At the end of the meeting, the Palestinian Muhammad Nazzal stressed the direction of Hamas and its regional allies, led by Iran, to change the existing regime in Egypt. The aforementioned Brotherhood delegation also met with the Palestinian reproach Amer, who asked them to study how an influence media presence existed for a movementHamas on the Egyptian scene, and the delegation held a meeting with Ahmed Al-Heila (the media official for the political office of Hamas), who assured them of the need to communicate between them and exchange information in the coming period due to its importance and to provide it with what is published about Hamas in the Egyptian newspapers. A secret meeting was also held in Syria during the month of November In 2010, a number of strict security measures were taken by Hamas and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, which was attended by the head of the Hamas political bureau, Khaled Mashaal, and elements of the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood and Brotherhood elements from Egypt, and the advisor of Imam Khamenei, Ali Akbar Velayati, from the elements of the police Revolutionary Guard participated with them. The attendees agreed on the following: In November 2010, many strict security measures were taken against it by Hamas and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. The head of the Hamas political bureau, Khaled Mashaal, and members of the International Organization of the Muslim Brotherhood and Brotherhood elements from Egypt attended the meeting. The advisor of Imam Khamenei, Ali Akbar Velayati, a member of the Revolutionary Guards participated with them. Police, the attendees agreed on the followingIn November 2010, many strict security measures were taken against it by Hamas and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. The head of the Hamas political bureau, Khaled Mashaal, and members of the International Organization of the Muslim Brotherhood and Brotherhood elements from Egypt attended the meeting. The advisor of Imam Khamenei, Ali Akbar Velayati, a member of the Revolutionary Guards participated with them. Police, the attendees agreed on the following :
1- The preparation and training of armed elements by trainers from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, who will be pushed from the Gaza Strip to Egypt during the events of January 20, 2011 .
24 - Continuing coordination and continuous contacts between Hamas elements with elements of jihadist and takfiri groups in Sinai, as part of the preparation and preparation for implementing the phases of the plan in Egypt .
3 Hamas ' support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to implement its plans to seize power .
Coordination was not limited to just the aforementioned travels, but during this there were several meetings that were important in revealing the external communication that the group sought. A meeting with a number of Brotherhood members, Muhammad Saad al-Katatni (the fourth accused), Hussein Muhammad Ibrahim Hussein, and Hamdi Hassan Ali Ibrahim, during which the parliamentary performance of the Brotherhood's representatives was reviewed and evaluated. A group of Brotherhood representatives, headed by Muhammad Saad al-Katatni (the fourth accused), held a meeting with representatives of the Brotherhood. The International Institute for Permanent Dialogue is an American non-governmental organization headed by the American Richard Murphy, the former US assistant secretary of state for Middle Eastern affairs, during November 2009 at the group's representatives' headquarters in Al-Ikhshid Street in the Manial area. Also, on December 4, 2006, the Palestinian Mahmoud al-Zahar, a leader of Hamas, visited the Eastern governorate where the frequency of the closed The home of the Brotherhood's Muhammad Morsi al-Ayyat and a meeting took place between them. The visit coincided with the victory of Hamas in the elections in the Gaza Strip. A closed meeting was also held on 6/6/2007 at the headquarters of the Arab Doctors Union of the Medical Syndicate in Cairo, attended by a delegation from the Muslim Brotherhood headed by Muhammad Muhammad Morsi Issa al-Ayyat. (He died), with the participation of a delegation of Hamas leaders, and Muhammad Morsi contacted Khaled Meshaal, head of the political bureau of Hamas during September 2009 and coordinated with him to overcome differences between some members of the Muslim Brotherhood in Hamas, and to consult on the common axes of the work of the Brotherhood and Hamas. And that in the context of preparing and preparing for the implementation of the group's plan, the leaders and members of the Brotherhood held meetings with some representatives of the wings of the international organization of the Brotherhood and some representatives of foreign organizations and foreign institutions in the country, including the meeting of the Brotherhood, Saad Al-Katatni, with the American Amy Kishano from the political department of the American embassy on 04/14/2010At the headquarters of the Brotherhood's Representatives on Al-Ikhshid Street in Manial, where the accused , Which can move the general public, and that their steps will be the basis for changing the balance, and that if they skip the events, it may be difficult to catch them and stop them more difficult. He asked the intelligence element if they had the ability to make the decision to move on their own, and he replied that the matter is in the hands of three major countries, including Germany.Abdel-Aty asked about the party that could be a channel that talks about the future, and he nominated the State of Turkey for that, as this strengthens their position. The matter was the subject of an organized measure and meetings were held for this matter, the text of which we provide as it came by transcribing the hadiths as follows It may be difficult to catch them and stop them more difficult. He asked the intelligence element if they had the ability to make the decision to move on their own, and he replied that the matter is in the hands of three major countries, including Germany.Abdel-Aty asked about the party that could be a channel that talks about the future, and he nominated the State of Turkey for that, as this strengthens their position. The matter was the subject of an organized measure and meetings were held for this matter, the text of which we provide as it came by transcribing the hadiths as follows It may be difficult to catch them and stop them more difficult. He asked the intelligence element if they had the ability to make the decision to move on their own, and he replied that the matter is in the hands of three major countries, including Germany.Abdel-Aty asked about the party that could be a channel that talks about the future, and he nominated the State of Turkey for that, as this strengthens their position. The matter was the subject of an organized measure and meetings were held for this matter, the text of which we provide as it came by transcribing the hadiths as follows Abdel-Aty asked about the party that could be a channel that talks about the future, and he nominated the State of Turkey for that, as this strengthens their position. The matter was the subject of an organized measure and meetings were held for this matter, the text of which we provide as it came by transcribing the hadiths as follows Abdel-Aty asked about the party that could be a channel that talks about the future, and he nominated the State of Turkey for that, as this strengthens their position. The matter was the subject of an organized measure and meetings were held for this matter, the text of which we provide as it came by transcribing the hadiths as follows :-
The person authorized to record his communications: I mean, if we discuss them, we will be able to meet an active channel that goes to talk to them, why not do such and such, based on personal motives from you .
The caller: Yes, of course. I mean, if we answered the people we were sitting with, and we came to call the man who organized the issue, we would tell him that we want an appointment with you, because so-and-so want to talk with you about matters that are as close to what you want, so you want to set an appointment for her from now, within a week, and we go and tell them on topic .
The person authorized to record his communications: It is possible to an extent that corresponds to the great .
The caller: Uh, of course, it is very possible that Rajab has been with him for three days. He saw him and said to him, “Come to me.” For what we left behind and he now sees large conglomerates, what is the problem? .
The person authorized to record his calls: Okay, take it into account. We have a seat nearby. We will sit down and see. We can say that this is something we should take into account so that you know how to move. .
In the context of subscribing by way of assistance, Ahmed Mohamed Abdel-Aty sent to Mohamed Morsi El-Ayat a message on his authorized follow-up phone, stating that your new email is drmorsyar@gmail.com and password zaazij2011.
As a continuation of the series of communication between the deceased Mohamed Morsi and the accused, Ahmed Abdel-Aty, a message was monitored between them, a copy of which could be obtained through secret sources via the e-mail they used on the Internet. ( aatty 2011 @gmail.com
( drmorsydragmail.com A message entitled Estimating a position on the Egyptian situation in the light of the Tunisian revolution and included a directive from the Brotherhood Ahmed Abdel-Aty to the ousted president on 9/22/2011 about the American and European position (France) - England) towards the Islamic revolution in Tunisia, and Europe's opinion of the totalitarian regimes that It has become vulnerable to collapse, and the undeclared Egyptian position in securing the system, and the position of the Egyptian street, especially the most mobile groups and the ability to bring about change such as students and workers, whose text was stated that one of the most important external positions that should be read carefully :-
He wondered about the extent to which the situation of revolution and regime change fits with the stage in which the Islamic movement plans and is based on the implementation of society, and the extent of the movement's ability to deal with the revolution when it occurs and be surprised by it. In a non-contradictory manner, in order to avoid failure or accusations of pragmatism and political opportunism, and pointed out the extent to which it is possible to avoid revolution and pressure the regime to obtain gains for the homeland and the Islamic movement without considering this as a waste of what can be called a historical opportunity, which entails avoiding principled statements in statements So as not to be a reason to block them in the future. He added that as long as the movement did not lead the revolution from its inception and did not return to it, it is better that the movement not have official positions and that participation be through individuals as ordinary citizens to avoid a high degree of risk or being scapegoated. :-
The first message: addressed by the aforementioned Palestinian to the Brotherhood, Hazem, on 7/2/2011, and included the fear that the Muslim Brotherhood would quickly enter into dialogue with the country’s ruling regime at that time. .
The second message: addressed by the Brotherhood Hazem to the Palestinian Ayman Taha on 7/2/2011 and included the results of the dialogue that the group's leaders attended with Major General Omar Suleiman, who called him the Fox, Vice President of the Republic at that time. The first message included that many analysts are not comfortable with the speedy entry of the Brotherhood into the cage of dialogue, because this brings legitimacy to the regime, and it will harm the unity of the revolutionaries, and in it the demand to leave before the dialogue has been exceeded, and some analysts fear that if the Brotherhood does not improve the rules of the game, it will turn into the largest revolution in history Egypt to the biggest prank in its history, and concluded that he is waiting for a response and a clarification of the situation, While the second message included a reference from the accused, Hazem Mansour, that whoever described him as a fox did not meet the minimum requirements during the meeting and did not provide anything useful.He added that yesterday all your uncles and uncles were in Cairo ( according to his description of them) and they were in a family party after a long longing, and the family's conditions were arranged and some of the poor family were re-supported and their conditions arranged. The house is not allowed until the thief leaves permanently, and he sent his message that those of your relatives in the field at the time of the millions are about (45-50%), and the normal times are (60%) in the morning, and about (70%) at night, and the field hospital in support, doctors and pharmacists (80%), and services and subsistence at a rate of (70%), They also received Western media courses to implement the agreed plan by spreading rumors and psychological warfare and directing internal and external public opinion to serve their plans, where a number of Muslim Brotherhood youth were present. In the Lebanese capital, Beirut, they attended training courses in a youth camp for the Muslim League in Lebanon and the youth of the Islamic Group and in the presence of a number of Brotherhood youth from Arab countries (the International Brotherhood Organization) during the period from July 4, 2010 to July 11, 2010, during which three courses were held in the Bekaa Valley And under the auspices and training of the Lebanese Hezbollah and Hamas, with the aim of rehabilitating some Brotherhood elements to participate in the implementation of the media plan agreed upon during the planning stages to seize power and implement their plans. Among the Brotherhood elements that monitor their attendance at these courses are AhmedMohamed Abdel-Aty (the thirty-first accused in the referral order) media skills of the official spokesman, and media management in light of crises and emergencies during the period from 20:15 July 2010, and youth members of the Muslim Brotherhood attended with him in the same two sessions, including Brotherhood Ahmed Diab and Brotherhood Ammar Mohamed El-Beltagy. Ammar Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Fayed (the fifteenth defendant in the referral order)- previously transferred, attended the professional skills course for managing media campaigns during the period from 17 to 17:July 11, 2010, where the aforementioned was one of the officials responsible for the Muslim Brotherhood's Web sites on the Internet, which is responsible for psychological warfare, spreading rumors and directing public opinion to serve the goals and plans of the Muslim Brotherhood. He also prepared a report on the outcome of his aforementioned mission to Lebanon. Held and the visits he made, the results of the workshop and the proposals of the media campaign during the meetings of the People's Assembly 2010, and they allied and coordinated with jihadist organizations inside and outside, Coordination with the leaders of Hamas and the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades to facilitate the infiltration of the Brotherhood elements through the border tunnels into the Gaza Strip, as well as developing the necessary programs for their military training inside the Gaza Strip, and collecting financial donations from Egyptian citizens under the pretext of helping the Palestinian people. These elements and their training with Hamas, providing weapons and ammunition to the Palestinian Hamas movement and smuggling them to them through tunnels, collecting and storing food commodities and petroleum materials in North Sinai Governorate to transfer them to the Gaza Strip through tunnels, preparing data and publications and distributing them publicly to provoke the masses by adopting the demands of opening the Rafah crossing and easing the siege on Gaza Strip Khalil Osama al-Aqeed infiltrated into the Gaza Strip several times through the border tunnels in the Egyptian area of Rafa. During his stay in the Gaza Strip, he lived in a camp called Beach Camp and frequented the camp mosque with Hamas members to hear the religious lessons he gaveThe movement's elements within the framework of motivating him to carry out training tasks leading to jihad and martyrdom for the sake of God, and he was trained on the use of many automatic weapons of different calibres, in addition to training on the RPG weapon from the members of the Palestinian Qassam Brigades, and the training took place in the Gaza Strip in Palestine, and that the leaders of the movement The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is aware of this, including the General Guide Muhammad Badie, his deputy Khairat al-Shater, Muhammad al-Beltagy, and Mohi Hamed Muhammad, the current supervisor of the group. Osama Fathi Ali Farhan) and a previous assistant to the Egyptian group, the Palestinian elements, following their infiltration into North Sinai Governorate in 1999, to raise a number of vital places in the country (places and police stations, the waterway of the Suez Canal , power stations), as this comes within the framework of the assignments received by the group From its official, which he receives in turn from the official of the Palestine Committee, MohieHamed al-Sayed, who is coordinating on an ongoing basis with the two Hamas members, the High Commissioner Hamdan Abu Zuhri and Ayman Taha, in order to develop training plans for these groups, their training programs, and the targets they target. After he was assigned to guard the ousted President Mohamed Morsi Al-Ayyat (died), then to guard the leader, Mohamed Khairat Al-Shater (the second accused), and the accused, Khalil Al-Aqeed, admitted in Case No. Lakhirat al-Shater from the Muslim Brotherhood, and that he is charged by the group with securing the electoral process in front of the electoral commission headquarters. His mobile phone also found pictures of the accused while he was inside one of the tunnels, and other pictures of him carrying what looked like a machine gun from which a belt with the Qassam Brigades was hanging, and pictures of the accused while he was He is sitting in front of a cemetery on which the martyr Sheikh Mujahid Ahmad is inscribedIsmail Yassin, a group was pushed members of internal and external armed organizations illegally infiltrated through the eastern border tunnels of the country and attacked military and police installations and Egyptian prisons to create a state of security vacuum and chaos in the country and enabled the arrested to escape. To prejudice the independence, unity and territorial integrity of the country as a result of what each of the following: Muhammad Badi' Abd al-Majid Sami (the first defendant), Muhammad Khairat Saad Abd al-Latif al-Shater (the second defendant) ), Muhammad Saad Tawfiq al-Katatni (the fourth defendant), Issam al-Din Muhammad Hussein al-Arian (the fifth defendant), Muhammad Muhammad Ibrahim al-Beltagy (the seventh defendant), Saad Ismat Muhammad Al-Husseini (the eighth defendant) accused), Hazem Muhammad Farouk (the ninth accused), Makki Hamid Muhammad Al-Sayed (the eleventh accused), Khaled Saad Hassanein Muhammad (the sixteenth accused), Khalil Osama Al-Aqeed (the thirty accused), and Ahmed Muhammad Muhammad Abd Al-Ati (the sixteenth accused), Thirty-first accused).On governorate January 25, protest demonstrations erupted in various vital locations in Cairo and manys from various political forces from the opposition parties. The Brotherhood lurked in Egypt and began watching events closely and waiting for the right time to pounce on the events and push its elements into the squares and transformed the peaceful demonstrations into bloody speech with the policemen. In implementation of their plan to spread chaos, and their agreement with the Hamas Political Bureau and the leaders of the international organization to assist them in spreading chaos and overthrowing the institutions of the Egyptian state as a means of controlling the reins of government by force and violence. Acts of violence between them to spread chaos, and the involvement of some elements on social networks to stir up public opinion, while opening channels with the regime to deceive it from participating in the January 25, 2011 demonstrations in order to avoid a security blow to the group in the event of the failure of those demonstrations and announcing this by meansThe media since January 24, 2011 and that those who participated in the demonstrations are a limited number of the group's youth and that they are personally participating, and at the same time coordination was made with Hamas and the Iranian Hezbollah to play a military role inside the country in coordination with some Bedouin members in Sinai to attack a number of One hundred and sixty police stations simultaneously, and they had the opportunity on Friday , January 28, which they called the Friday of Anger, as the group participated with its members in the demonstrations and clashed with the police forces with the aim of spreading chaos. The armed forces are sent to various governorates to secure vital installations.At the same time, Hamas, as the group's military arm, moved its armed terrorist groups on the Egyptian border with the Gaza Strip in implementation of the agreed-upon plan. As a result, several crimes were committed by the intruders, who numbered more than eight hundred people, As well as the takfiri jihadists from the Sinai Bedouins, all of whom they were used by the global organization of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and the Brotherhood in Egypt, where they carried out actions that destroyed the country's independence and territorial integrity. Members of the Hamas movement, which controls the Gaza Strip, and with the help of the Takfiri Bedouin elements in Sinai, deliberately infiltrated the Egyptian borders from the eastern side through tunnels in a manner they entered the Egyptian city of Rafah in the form of groups of independent four-wheel drive vehicles armed with heavy firearms - RPGs, Greenovs, and automatic rifles - some of them took a direct road to Cairo via the Peace Bridge to join the demonstrators to cause chaos according to the agreed schemeOn him, and others attacked all police ambushes from Rafah to Al-Arish, passing through the Al-Masoura area and the entrance to Sheikh Zuwaid and Al-Harash. With RPG guns, an ambush that responds to them or exchanges fire with them, which resulted in the martyrdom of many policemen in these ambushes, and the ambush of Al-Masoura Square, in which two armored vehicles belonging to the Central Security are stationed, was stationed with an RPG launcher, and the ambush of Al-Balakeh was attacked and shot on the one who was in it and two soldiers from the security forces were martyred. On January 28, an RPG was fired at the peace ambush, forcing its soldiers to withdraw, and attacking the Rafah Police Station, the Central Security District Command in Rafah, the State Security Investigations Office, and the Central Security Sector in Al-Harash Rafah , which was attacked daily for being the last site in Rafah to raise the Egyptian flag, All the Central Security factions on the streets of Rafah, the gas pumping and distribution station, and the gas line heading to Jordan in the Sabil area were hit, gunmen with automatic rifles assaulted the operators and placed an explosive device underneath it and detonated it, and the gas line was detonated several times after that. The Sheikh Zuweid police station was attacked and the forces stationed inside it defended it as much as they could until they were unable to maintain control of the building, so the director of security instructed them to withdraw to Al-Arish. The kidnappers attacked the Civil Status Department in Al-Raysah and seized the devices, equipment and national number cards in the unit. They attacked the traffic, the court, the central registry, and the Security Directorate in Al-Arish. They focused on evacuating the eastern region from the police and ambushes along the road to Al-Arish, which forced the security forces to withdraw the policemen to Specific places to protect them, and they were able to control the border strip and cut off the international road leading to the city of Rafah, and owed them full control of the area behind the border area from January 31 until about mid-February, from the Rafah sector until about five kilometers before the city of Al-Arish, with a total area of about sixty a kilometer along the international road, and the police forces completely lost control of that area of the country and became under the control of Hamas and the Bedouin who supported them. Which was subjected to the control of Hamas and the Takfiris except through a personal identification card issued by members of the Muslim Brotherhood in Arish, and they made places on the roads to stop and search the people, and among those who were arrested were three police Officers and one of its secretaries, so they kidnapped them, burned their car and held them hostage in order toInfluencing the public authorities in the performance of their work and they continued their advance, and three groups of them headed towards the prisons of Al-Marj , Abu Zaabal and Wadi Al-Natroun to smuggle the loyalists. The Wadi al-Natrun prisons area, they broke down its walls and stormed the wards and cells and enabled the prisoners of Hamas, the Lebanese Hezbollah, the jihadists, the Muslim Brotherhood and other criminals who were destined to death, they stole weapons and ammunition from the insurance battalion in Wadi al-Natrun prison and the contents of the prison and the industrial area attached to it, stealing the contents of the strategic food store and stealing the custody of prisoners' clothes All the contents of the The hospital and the pharmacy were stolen, in addition to the theft of weapons, ammunition, riot-dispersal weapons, helmets, gas bombs, the burning of the records of the armory, and they possessed and acquired firearms, RPGs, machine guns, automatic rifles and ammunition, which are not permitted to be possessed or acquired. Disturbing security and public order and compromising the system of government, and this crime occurred with the intention of compromising the country's independence, unity and territorial integrity, all this in order to achieve the group's desire to change the system of government by force and ascend the rule of the country, and they had what they wanted after the former president stepped downMuhammed Hosni Mubarak announced on the verdict on February 11, 2011. light of the events that the country witnessed at that time, which the Muslim Brotherhood reviewed and turned the tide to serve its interests, the Military Council, which took over the management of the country's affairs during that period, held the presidential elections, which resulted in the custody of the deceased Muhammad Morsi. Al-Ayat came to power and was installed on 30/6/2012 (after the election results were announced on 24/6/2012 and this stage did not go unnoticed after the implementation of the dream was just around the corner, Khaled Mashaal joined Hamas in June 2012 with a delegation of Muslim Brotherhood youth in the country and the international organization, where the meeting took place in the apartment of Al-Jazeera broadcaster Ahmed Mansour in Egypt, and the meeting was attended by Mohammed Salah Al- Bardawil, son of the leader of Hamas, where the meeting included coordination on the role of the Brotherhood in the coming periodAnd the political steps that the Brotherhood organizations will take (the international organization Hamas - the group in Egypt) after the success of Dr. Mohamed Morsi assuming the presidency of the republic and how to move in the event of his failure to win. Destruction and because they are one faction and have a united definition and unite them in a common language and include one global organization, which was confirmed by one of the video clips that the court saw showing Hamas'ation of the Muslim Brotherhood, and a person whom the court annex appeared. I pledge to God the Most High, the Great - I pledge to God the Most High, the Great, to adhere to the call of the Muslim Brotherhood, to jihad for its, to fulfill the conditions of its membership, to have full confidence in its leadership, and to listen and obey in the stimuli and the compelled.Therefore, cooperation between the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the international organization of the and leaders of Hamas and Hezbollah linked to Iran continued, even after the group assumed power in the country, where a training course was held for Brotherhood and Palestinian elements on 3-16-2013 at the headquarters of the Arab Islamic Gathering located in property No. 2 Talaat Harb Street - in Cairo - in the center of the city, and the supervisors of that session were Palestinian elements, and during which meetings were held between the attendees of the session with the Palestinian from the leadership of the Hamas movement (the Palestinian Musa Abu Marzouk). The course was completed in Beirut, Lebanon, from 22-4-2013-23 6 - 2013 under the story of Saer al-Akkad in the headquarters (at the Research Center for Palestinian Studies) located in property No. 1, Embassies Street in Chiah Beirut. The founder of the center is the Palestinian Walid Muhammad Ali, who is associated with Hezbollah and Iran. followingA training course for Brotherhood and Palestinian members was held on March 16, 2013 at the headquarters of the Arab Islamic Gathering, located in real estate No. 2, Talaat Harb Street - Cairo - in the center of the city. The supervisors of that course were Palestinian elements. Musa Abu Marzouk) and the course was completed in Beirut, Lebanon, from 4/22/2013 to 6/23/2013 under the story of Saer al-Akkad at the headquarters (at the Research Center for Palestine Studies) located in property No . 1, Embassies Street in Chiah Beirut. The founder of the center is Palestinian Walid Muhammad Ali Associated with Hezbollah and Iran, and this center is managed by elements of the Iranian security services (Iranian Revolutionary Guards), as it turns out the following:A training course for Brotherhood and Palestinian members was held on March 16, 2013 at the headquarters of the Arab Islamic Gathering, located in real estate No. 2, Talaat Harb Street - Cairo - in the center of the city. The supervisors of that course were Palestinian elements. Musa Abu Marzouk) and the course was completed in Beirut, Lebanon, from 4/22/2013 to 6/23/2013 under the story of Saer al-Akkad at the headquarters (at the Research Center for Palestine Studies) located in property No . 1, Embassies Street in Chiah Beirut. The founder of the center is Palestinian Walid Muhammad Ali Associated with Hezbollah and Iran, and this center is managed by elements of the Iranian security services (Iranian Revolutionary Guards), as it turns out the following:Attending the course with the Palestinian from the leadership of Hamas (the Palestinian Musa Abu Marzouk) and the course was completed in Beirut, Lebanon, from 22-4-2013 until 23-6-2013 under the story of Saer Al-Akkad at the headquarters (at the Research Center for Palestine Studies ) located in real estate No. 1, Street The embassies in Chiah Beirut, and the founder of the center is the Palestinian Walid Muhammad Ali, who is linked to Hezbollah and Iran.Attending the course with the Palestinian from the leadership of Hamas (the Palestinian Musa Abu Marzouk) and the course was completed in Beirut, Lebanon, from 22-4-2013 until 23-6-2013 under the story of Saer Al-Akkad at the headquarters (at the Research Center for Palestine Studies) located in real estate No. 1, Street The embassies in Chiah Beirut, and the founder of the center is the Palestinian Walid Muhammad Ali, who is linked to Hezbollah and Iran. Attending the course with the Palestinian from the leadership of Hamas (the Palestinian Musa Abu Marzouk) and the course was completed in Beirut, Lebanon, from 22-4-2013 until 23-6-2013 under the story of Saer Al-Akkad at the headquarters (at the Research Center for Palestine Studies) located in real estate No. 1, Street The embassies in Chiah Beirut, and the founder of the center is the Palestinian Walid Muhammad Ali, who is linked to Hezbollah and Iran. Attending the course with the Palestinian from the leadership of Hamas (the Palestinian Musa Abu Marzouk) and the course was completed in Beirut, Lebanon, from 22-4-2013 until 23-6-2013 under the story of Saer Al-Akkad at the headquarters (at the Research Center for Palestine Studies) located in real estate No. 1, Street The embassies in Chiah Beirut, and the founder of the center is the Palestinian Walid Muhammad Ali, who is linked to Hezbollah and Iran. :
The training course was held in one of Hezbollah’s secret houses (Khomeini’s villa in the Scout area in southern Lebanon), accompanied by a Hezbollah member by the name of Kodi Abdullah Shari. And the name is Abbas Kdouh, and the name is Bassam Youssef, the youth official in Hezbollah
B - The course in Egypt dealt with the following topics (the Rafah crossing agreement - the repercussions of the Egyptian revolution on the Arab cause and Palestinian refugees - resistance operations - the relationship of the Muslim Brotherhood with Hamas, as well as the rapprochement between the Shiite and Sunni sects ).
C- The course in Beirut dealt with the following topics (soft war, the role of media in the Arab revolutions - Hezbollah and its influence in the region - how to manage youth among Hezbollah cadres). Hamas in Lebanon - and the area south of the Litani River and watching the Israeli settlement of Karachi Moon located on the Lebanese-Palestinian border .
D- It was found that this session, which was held in Lebanon, takes place within the framework of coordination and cooperation between the leaders of the foreign organization elements (Hezbollah - Hamas - the Iranian security services - the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood) and the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in the country, where it was monitored that a number of Egyptians attended that session. .
He also held meetings and exchanged meetings between the leaders of these organizations, including (Khaled Mashaal - Ismail Haniyeh - Salah al-Bardawil - Khairat al-Shater - Muhammad Badie and others) and in the presence of young people from the Muslim Brotherhood and the international organization and youth from Hamas, and in this regard several training courses were held for Brotherhood elements and elements Among those foreign organizations (the use of weapons, the protection of personalities in the media, etc.), experts from Iran and Hezbollah were consulted during these training courses, as follows:- A secret organizational meeting was held between the head of the Palestinian government of Hamas, Ismail Haniyeh) on 20-7-2012 with the Muslim Brotherhood youth after delivering the Friday sermon at the Al-Azhar Mosque in the country. The meeting included coordination and cooperation on the beginning of working together to enable the Brotherhood to control power in Egypt Media control through media channels and the propaganda war against the former regime in Egypt. A training course on the method of using weapons was held for a number of Muslim Brotherhood youth cadres during the last half of July 2012 in the Gaza Strip, attended by a number of Muslim Brotherhood youth and cadres, in the presence and supervision of Mushir Omar Al-Masry, one of the cadres The international organization of the Brotherhood and another in the international organization is called Abu Bakr Hamdi, and he uses the nom de guerre Ark Al-MasryAbu Bakr Hamdi uses the nom de guerre Ark Al-MasryAbu Bakr Hamdi uses the nom de guerre Ark Al-Masry Arch elmasry He uses it through the social network Facebook, and his phone number is 009960590322330 and he lives in Saudi Arabia. The course included training in the use of weapons, protection of personalities and martial arts, strengthening the spirit of belonging and loyalty to the group and leadership, dealing with ambushes with high skill, how to deal with any emergency, and during the course of the course The Brotherhood cadres attending that training session met with leaders from the Hamas movement, Dr. Mahmoud al-Zahar, the commander of the al-Qassam Brigades in the West Bank and Gaza - called Mushir Omar al-Masri, one of the cadres of the international organization of the Brotherhood, and because the rule of the country was not the supreme, but rather a step on the path to their desired goal of establishing a united Islamic state according to Their thought and understanding of Islam, and whoever is other than them or is hostile to them is one of the invaders and authoritarians from the enemies of God. Therefore, visions and concepts differed between a ruler who rules with the ideology of the Brotherhood and its list, and a people who seek him as an abstract president who does not recognize the country’s borders.And a people sacrificed their blood for the sake of a grain of sand from their land, and their fate was to demise, as protests and demonstrations began and calls were raised. It was not until the rule was not general until the people came out against him on the thirtieth of June 2013, asking him to leave in protest against his mismanagement of the country, and during this flaming period it did not stand The Brotherhood and its supporters are idly idly concerned about losing their dream and squandering their gains. The leading elements of the Muslim Brotherhood in the country, through their links with relations and contacts with elements affiliated with foreign foreign organizations (Hamas - Hezbollah), as well as takfiri and jihadist organizations in the country and abroad, resorted to violence and chaos in the country and terrorized the Egyptian people and peaceful demonstrators Before and during the events of the revolution on 30/6/2013, through the following:The blazing Brotherhood and its supporters did not stand idly by when they lost their dream and squandered their gains, so the leading elements of the Muslim Brotherhood in the country, through their ties and contacts with elements affiliated with foreign foreign organizations (Hamas - Hezbollah), as well as the takfiri and jihadist organizations in the country and abroad, resorted to violence and inciting chaos in the country and terrorizing the people Al-Masry and the peaceful demonstrators before and during the events of the revolution on 30/6/2013, through the following:The blazing Brotherhood and its supporters did not stand idly by when they lost their dream and squandered their gains, so the leading elements of the Muslim Brotherhood in the country, through their ties and contacts with elements affiliated with foreign foreign organizations (Hamas - Hezbollah), as well as the takfiri and jihadist organizations in the country and abroad, resorted to violence and inciting chaos in the country and terrorizing the people Al-Masry and the peaceful demonstrators before and during the events of the revolution on 30/6/2013, through the following: :-
1- Assembling popular battalions and groups from noon on 30/6/2013 until dawn on 1/7/2013 and hiding in selected homes of the Brotherhood, buying large quantities of helmets and bumpers for stones and managing them through leadership centers to collect information and take leaders by orders from the leadership of the group and members of the office Guidance .
2- Supporting these movements through the Egyptian channel, the media arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the use of encrypted codes through its programs that are broadcast to mobilize groups and battalions of Brotherhood elements to assist the specific areas in which anti-Brotherhood crowd gather while filming violence and bullying and broadcasting it on all media to provoke and intimidate citizens .
3- Places were identified for the establishment and housing of the elements hired by the Brotherhood and those not affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood organization in apartments and separate places, and they were used through agreed signals to start implementing their plans to cause violence and bullying. .
4- A number of Brotherhood youths and their hired members, armed for their benefit, were planted within the circles of peaceful demonstrators in order to monitor their movements, abort them, and broadcast some news and rumors that help intimidate and provoke citizens, and provide them with additional armed groups that intervene in the appropriate time and place to carry out acts of violence and bullying. .
5- The leaders of the Brotherhood coordinated with the leaders of the Hamas movement before the events of the 30/6/2013 revolution, by holding secret meetings and monitoring contacts, including contacts between the so-called Khaled Mishaal and the so-called Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas with a number of members of the Muslim Brotherhood leaders during mid-June 2013 Among them is the so-called Khairat Al-Shater .
6- A number of members of the Al-Qassam Brigades (the military wing of Hamas) illegally entered the country (infiltrating and participating in provoking chaos and violence and shooting at demonstrators in implementation of the high plan agreed upon by the leaders of the Brotherhood and Hamas, which is coordinating with Hezbollah members, and following his isolation From his position and within the framework of the aforementioned criminal scheme, armed elements similar to the previous targeting the facilities and personnel of the armed forces and the police pushed to overthrow the Egyptian state and create a pretext for foreign intervention in the country, as follows: :-
- The leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood, in coordination with Hamas, sought to push a number of members of the Mujahideen Brigade and the separate wing of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad movement, who infiltrated by illegal means (infiltration) on 25/7/2013 in order to implement their terrorist plans in Sinai and carry out terrorist acts against the armed forces and police there .
Those elements carried out bombings on 29/7/2013 in separate places in Sinai as part of their terrorist plans in the following places: (Ambush in Al-Kawthar neighborhood - Sheikh Zuwayed Gate ambush - Real estate tax ambush - Abu Tawila ambush of the armed forces and police .
- Elements of Hamas and Hezbollah forming groups to listen in on the wireless and communications devices of the armed forces and police forces in Sinai, and the presence of these groups in the Gaza Strip on the Egyptian border with the Gaza Strip (the other side) , where they in turn provide the jihadi elements in Sinai with any information they obtain to serve their terrorist goals. It was also possible to monitor communications and telephone conversations and obtain an audio recording of them through secret sources between Brotherhood leadership elements with Salafi elements and jihadist elements, and the most prominent of these recordings are the following: :-
An audio recording of a telephone conversation dated 1/7/2013 from the Brotherhood's Ayman Shawqi Al-Khatib from the phone 1223971398, and the Brotherhood's Khaled Saad Hassanein from the Deputy Leader's Assistant Khairat Al-Shater, and on the phone number 010000110545, where he was asked to inform Khairat Al-Shater that he had asked Mohamed El-Beltagy to gather in the morning In Al-Nahda Square, and that it has been implemented, and the Brotherhood must attack the headquarters of the parties (the Popular Current - Al -Nour-Al-Wasat and others) in all governorates this evening and they are burned and attacked by thugs who are rented with money, which is the solution now to stir up public opinion and chaos and flee the opposition and break up their demonstrations ,The Abbasid Square must be mobilized and the following squares (Al-Nahda - Rabaa Al-Adawiya - Al-Abbasiya) must be mobilized, and sit in it through tents, and emphasizing the burning of the opposition party headquarters this evening after midnight, and asking him to notify El-Beltagy to implement those directives and contact him .
- An audio recording of the conversation, a phone call dated 3/7/2013 from the Salafi Hussam Fawzy Jabr Moqbel from the phone number 1091994646.With the so-called Nour Mahmoud Rashid, for her pardon for the jihadi elements in Sinai and who is linked to the Islamic Group on the phone number 1009306337, where the conversation included that the jihadi element Nour Rashid informed the Salafi Hossam Fawzi of his dissatisfaction With the situation and its difficulty and that they should humiliate the police and armed forces, carry out terrorist operations and strike the ambush next to a house The so-called Abd al-Wahhab Badawi, and that the ten people must be notified of the implementation of terrorist operations and a peaceful adequacy, and he was also asked to take up arms to secure today's march, and that the Islamists will take up arms against the opposition and political from the Tamarod movement. :
A- Forming a team of the movement’s leaders to contact the new Egyptian government and put pressure on the Egyptian armed forces to stop demolishing Hamas tunnels in order to avoid a clash between the movement and the Egyptian army. .
B- The importance of holding intensive meetings with the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to follow up on ways to find appropriate solutions to get out of the difficult crisis and the current critical situation of the Muslim Brotherhood by presenting new proposals to the Egyptian government, namely (the return of Mohamed Morsi to the presidency - the announcement of the Egyptian People’s Assembly elections, assistance In the formation of committees to supervise the elections in exchange for the Hamas movement to intervene in the Sinai to stop the activity of the militants and restore calm there .
C - Putting pressure on the Egyptian government and the Egyptian army to maintain the tunnels belonging to Hamas and to spare the region and the Egyptian army a confrontation with Hamas, in which no party will be victorious, while maintaining the continuation of Qatari oil pumping to the Gaza Strip and under the supervision of the Egyptian authorities .
D- The Muslim Brotherhood supported the leadership and the youth in their battle with the new regime in Egypt and helped them by all means by pushing a number of members of the Al-Qassam Brigades in Gaza through the tunnels in coordination with all the Takfiri and jihadist groups in Sinai, and supporting them with weapons and attacking the headquarters of the armed forces and the Egyptian Ministry of the Interior. In coordination with the leaders of the takfiri groups in Sinai, a number of members (the internal security apparatus of Hamas) were pushed into the country during the coming period to implement their plans and support the Muslim Brotherhood after its fall in the June 30, 2013 revolution. satellites, and telephones with international segments on the network (Palestinian and Lebanese mobile), :-
A- The Brotherhood’s deputy guide, Khairat Al-Shater, uses the e-mail
addresses, which are: :-khairatshater@yahoo.com .k@khairat-elshater.com .ks@khairat-elshater.com
B- The deceased President of the
Republic, Muhammad Morsi al-Ayyat, and in his capacity as the organizer of the
Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt . drmorsydr@gmail.com
C - Brother Khaled Saad Hassanein
Muhammad, from the current Assistant Deputy Guide (Khairat Al-Shater), born on
30/6/1970, residing in 18 Ali Hamed Street - Al-Munira Al-Gharbia - Imbaba -
Giza
It uses my email
address (@gmail.com 9700 khaledsaad
(@hotmail.com2002theday.@hotmail.com)
D - Brotherhood Ahmed Mohamed
Abdel-Aty and uses an e-mail entitled
Atty2010 - atty 2011 - atty 2020
E - Brotherhood Ahmed Al-Hakim and
uses an email address with the title (elhkimh@yahoo.com)
This is the group and these are their
ideas, and it is not surprising that this was their act, so what about a group
whose guide provided it with weapons. On May 12, 2011, Muhammad Badi’ held
several meetings with a number of Islamic elements in the city of Tripoli,
Lebanon, about coordinating cooperation among them and unifying efforts and
advocacy frameworks It was agreed during those meetings to provide all forms of
support to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to implement their plans in Egypt
and to control power by controlling the head of the state, and it was also
agreed that Islamic groups in Libya would provide timely support to the
Brotherhood in Egypt To put pressure on the Military Council through arms
smuggling and other illegal actions so that the armed forces stay away from work
and interfere in politics so that the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt can fully
control the reins of power (the People’s Assembly and the Shura Council, the
constitution, the presidential elections), and the National Security Authority
has monitored The group's general guide smuggledA arms deal across Libyan
territory to arm the Brotherhood’s youth during the month of February 2012, and
the leadership of this group, which was established against the law, was
assumed by Muhammad Khairat al-Shater (the second accused), Muhammad Saad
al-Katatni (the fourth accused), Issam al-Din al-Arian (the fifth accused), and
Muhammad Ibrahim Al-Beltagy (the seventh defendant), this is in contrast to
those whose evidence of guilt was carried on this accusation by the law, and the
law prevented the court from punishing them because of their previous
convictions for the same accusation, according to final rulings in other cases,
which makes it not permissible to consider the case regarding them due to
previous adjudication, such as the accused, Muhammad Badi’ Abd al-Majid Sami,
Saad Ismat Al-Husseini and Ahmed Mohamed Abdel-Aty as well. Hazem Mohamed
Farouk (the ninth defendant), Issam El-Haddad (the tenth defendant), Mohi Hamed
Mohamed El-Sayed (the eleventh defendant), and Ayman Ali Sayed Ahmed (the third
defendant) joined this group. Tenth), Khaled Saad Hassanein (the sixteenth
defendant), Ahmed Muhammad Al-Hakim (the twenty-second defendant), and Khalil
Osama Al-Aqeed(the thirty-three defendant), Muhammad Fathi Rafa’a Al-Tahtawi
(the thirty-fifth defendant), and Asaad Muhammad Ahmed Al-Sheikha (the
thirty-sixth defendant). God is a colonel in the National Security Sector,
Muhammad Abdel Hamid Najm al-Sabbagh, an officer in the State Security
Investigations Agency, Brigadier Khaled Muhammad Zaki Okasha, and Lt. Colonel
Muhammad Mabrouk Abu Khattab, an officer in the National Security Sector in the
investigations of Case No. 56460 of 2013 Felonies of the First Division of Nasr
City before the investigative judge and what he made Major General Hamdi
Mohamed Mohamed Badin, former Director of the Military Police Department, and
Major General Mohamed Farid Hegazy, Commander of the Second Field Army, from
statements before the trial court before the return, and from the statements of
Captain Ahmed Farouk Fahmy Khater, and Mohamed Ahmed Ali Hassan Ibrahim,
Secretary of Police in the Najda Al-Shorouk Department, And Mohamed Ahmed Sayed
Mohamed Afifi, the officer in the National Security Sector in the caseNo. 1018
for the year 2013 New Cairo Administrator is second, and from what was made by
Major General Mohamed Naguib Hassan Hanafi, Director of North Sinai Security,
Major General Ali Ahmed Ahmed Abu Zaid Ahmed, Director of North Sinai
Investigations, Major General Abdel Latif Mustafa Al Hadi Amer, State Security
Inspector, and Major General Hassan Mohamed Abdel Rahman Youssef, First
Assistant Minister of Interior for State Security Investigations, Ambassador
Wafaa Ashraf Mohamed Bassim, former First Assistant Foreign Minister,
Ambassador Yasser Mustafa Kamal Othman, Head of the Egyptian Mission to the
Palestinian National Authority, Ambassador Baha El-Din Bahgat Ibrahim
El-Desouky, Director of the Palestine Department at the Egyptian Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, and Major General Habib Ibrahim Habib Al-Adly, the former
Minister of Interior, Lieutenant-Colonel Ashraf Abdel Aziz Morsi
Abdel-Muttalib, head of the Border Police Intelligence Office in North Sinai,
and Mohamed Hosni El-Sayed Mubarak, the former President of the Republic, from
statements in Case No. Mohamed Soliman,Field Marshal Muhammad Hussein Tantawi,
Major General Murad Muhammad Muwafi, Major General Mustafa Mahmoud Abd al-Nabi,
Major General Hassan Ahmad Muhammad al-Ruwaini, and Major General Muhammad
Ahmad Farid al-Tuhamy in Case No. 1227 of 2011 Qasr al-Nil Felonies attached to
the present case, and from the investigations of the National Security
Authority and its attachments and the examination of electronic mailing
addresses of the defendants mentioned in the national security investigations,
from the postal addresses authorized for examination of the defendants, and
from the electronic message on the e-mail of the deceased Mohamed Morsi
received from the 31st defendant, during which the latter reviewed the American
and European position on the events in Tunisia and the Egyptian position in
securing the system and dealing with the opposition forces and the Brotherhood
Among the global list of the Muslim Brotherhood, and what was proven from the
query received from the legal department of Vodafone Egypt for
Telecommunications, the mobile phone number receiving calls from outside the
country belongs to the deceased Mohamed Morsi.Court review of the
correspondences of the Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs for the Minister’s
Office Affairs addressed to the head of the State Security Investigation Agency
dated 2/2/2011, 6/2/2011, 7/2/2011 and what was proven from reading the
outgoing and incoming messages on the phone of the accused Khalil Osama
Muhammad al-Aqeed and from reading Judgment issued by the Ismailia Appellate
Misdemeanors Court on 23/6/2013 in Case No. 1302 of 2012 Third Ismailia
Misdemeanour and Case No. 423 of 2013 Supreme State Security Restriction and
the Court’s review of Case No. 8296 of 2012 New Cairo Felonies, and from the
testimony of the movements presented in the case Member No. 56460 of 2013
Criminal First Division Nasr City for the accused: Muhammad Saad Tawfiq Mustafa
al-Katatni, Saad Ismat Muhammad al-Husseini, Hazem Muhammad Farouk Abd
al-Khaleq Mansour, Muhammad Muhammad Ibrahim al-Beltagy abroad, the
international list of the Muslim Brotherhood, the document establishing the
Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas, and what the accused Muhammad decided Saad
Tawfiq Katatni investigations.As this was, and it was clear from what the
judgment wrote that he showed the fact of the case with all the legal elements
of the crimes that he condemned the appellants for and he cited compelling
evidence that would lead to the order of the judgment on it. I examined her
with sufficient scrutiny and made her fully aware that she had done what she
should have done to scrutinize the research to know the truth, and it was
decided that the law did not draw a form or pattern in which the judgment
formulates a statement of the punishable incident and the circumstances in
which it occurred and when the total of what the judgment mentioned was
sufficient in understanding the incident With its pillars and circumstances, as
concluded by the court - as is the case in the current case - this is a
realization of the rule of law, and therefore the prevention of the appellants
in this regard is irrelevant.Since that was the case, and the legislator had
stipulated in Article 86 bis c of the Penal Code, whoever sought for a foreign
country, an association, body, organization, group, or gang that has its
headquarters outside the country, or for anyone who works for the benefit of
any of them, shall be punished with life imprisonment. Anyone who communicates
with it or with him, to carry out any act of terrorism inside Egypt, or against
its property, institutions, employees, diplomatic representatives, or citizens
during their work or presence abroad, or participate in committing any of the
aforementioned.The penalty shall be the death penalty if the crime that is the
subject of the pursuit or communication occurs, or he attempts to commit it,
and the requirement to implement this text and apply its provisions requires
the availability of a material element first, which is the material work done
by the offender, either by seeking for the organization, group, or gang whose
headquarters are outside the country or those who work In its interest, or by
communicating with it, or by those who work for its benefit, and seeking or
communicating is by various possible or available means, and the legislator
requests that such acts would lead to terrorist acts or damage to the country’s
military, political, diplomatic or economic status. Second:A moral element,
which is the general criminal intent, with both knowledge and will, that is,
that the offender has directed his will to commit acts of seeking and
communicating while he is aware of them, and that it is to carry out terrorist
acts or that would harm the country’s military, political, diplomatic or
economic status, even if no harm actually occurred because of it. Its elements
are complete in the case of the offender and he is entitled to be punished for
it even if those damages did not occur, and the legislator stressed the
punishment for it by making the death penalty instead of life imprisonment if
the crime is the subject of the pursuit or communication or attempts to commit
it, and that crime occurs with every act that transmits information or data In
any of the matters related to the country or its military interests, such as
those related to the affairs of the armed forces, their preparation, armament,
places of concentration, sustenance and plans, or any matter related to the
country’s policy, managing all its internal or external political affairs and its
diplomatic relations with all countries, as well as any act that conveys any
information about the situation EconomicThe country, its balance, its strategic
stock, and the shortcomings in all aspects of life inside the country and their
cause, and whether the transmission of such information was through the
perpetrator’s pursuit of that organization or group with those who work for its
benefit, or by communicating with them by any means of communication. The law,
since that was the case, and it was decided that the participation in the
commission of crimes or participation in them is either that the offender is a
principal or an accomplice in them and is considered a primary perpetrator in
the crime in accordance with the text of Article 39 of the Penal Code and
whoever commits the crime alone or with others or whoever enters into the crime
Committing it if it consists of a number of acts, then it comes deliberately as
one of the acts constituting it. As for participation in the crime according to
the text of Article 40 of the Penal Code, it can be by instigating the
commission of the act constituting the crime if this act was committed based on
this incitement, or it is in agreement with other than to commit the crime and
it occurred in accordance with this agreement, orBy assisting in its commission
by giving the perpetrator a weapon, machinery or anything used in the
commission of the crime with his knowledge of it, or assisting them in any
other way in the acts prepared, facilitating, or complementary to its
perpetration, since that was the case, and the court had evidenced the evidence
of the crime of communicating against the appellants The first, second, third,
fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth, and the participation of the 14th appellant by
the two methods of agreement and assistance with them in committing it, and she
cited the justifiable evidence and the presumptions that she was assured of
that they committed the crime of communicating with those working for the
benefit of the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood and its
military wing, the Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas, whose headquarters are
outside the country with the intention of carrying out acts Terrorism and
harming the country’s military and economic status and its national interests,
and that their will tended to commit this crime and contribute to the illusion
of it.Cooperating with that international organization and its military arm in
Palestine to carry out terrorist acts inside the country and against its
property, institutions, employees and citizens with the aim of spreading chaos
and overthrowing the Egyptian state, leading to the Muslim Brotherhood’s
seizure of power. They received media training courses to implement the
agreed-upon plan by spreading rumors and psychological warfare and directing
internal and external public opinion to serve their plans. They allyed and
coordinated with jihadist organizations inside and outside that were affiliated
with that organization. They infiltrated the Gaza Strip by illegal means,
received military training, and smuggled weapons and ammunition into the
country and transmitted private data. The country’s political and economic
conditions and how they are exploited among themselves via the Internet. The
crime, the subject of communicating, took place by pushing a group of elements
of internal and external armed organizations that illegally infiltrated through
the tunnels.The country’s eastern border and attacked the Egyptian military and
police installations and prisons to create a state of security vacuum and chaos
in the country and enabled those arrested to escape. The first, second, third,
fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth appellants jointly hold criminal responsibility
and condemn them as original perpetrators. Considering the fourteenth appellant
as an accomplice in the crime of communicating with someone who works for an
organization based outside the country to carry out terrorist acts and damage
the country’s political, military, economic and national status. The obituary
on the ruling in this regard is sound.As such, and Article 86 of the Penal Code
added to Law No. 97 of 1992 stipulates that (in the application of the
provisions of this law, terrorism means every use of force, violence, threat or
intimidation resorted to by the offender in implementation of an individual or
collective criminal project with the aim of disturbing public order Or
endangering the safety and security of the community if that would harm people,
spread terror among them, endanger their lives, freedoms, or security, or cause
damage to the environment, communications, transportation, money, buildings, or
public or private properties, or their embezzlement, appropriation, prevention
or Obstructing public authorities, places of worship, or science institutes to
exercise their duties, or obstructing the application of the constitution, laws
or regulations).The legislator, after providing in the previous text a
comprehensive and comprehensive definition of terrorism, stipulated in Article
86 bis of the Penal Code that “Whoever establishes, establishes, organizes or
manages, contrary to the provisions of the law, an association, body,
organization, group, or gang whose purpose is to be punished with imprisonment)
Calling by any means to disrupt the provisions of the constitution or laws, or
preventing one of the state institutions or one of the public authorities from
carrying out their work, or assaulting the personal freedom of the citizen or
other public freedoms and rights guaranteed by the constitution and the law, or
harming national unity or social peace. Assuming leadership or leadership in
it, or providing it with material or financial aid, while being aware of the
purpose it calls for, whoever joins an association, corporation, organization,
group or gang provided for in the previous paragraph or participates in it in
any way with His knowledge of her purposes...The legislator stressed the
punishment in Article 86 bis of the Penal Code if the means of committing any
of the crimes stipulated in the three paragraphs of the previous Article is
terrorism by making the penalty death or life imprisonment for the crime
stipulated in the first paragraph and aggravated imprisonment for the crime
stipulated in The second paragraph and imprisonment for a period not exceeding
ten years for the crime stipulated in the third paragraph, and it is clear from
the previous texts that the crime of assuming the leadership of a group
established in violation of the provisions of the law aims to disrupt the
provisions of the constitution and the law and prevent state institutions and
public authorities from their tool of work and assault on the personal freedom
of citizens And public rights, harming national unity and social peace, and
taking terrorism as a means to achieve those goals, for which the second, third
and fifth appellants condemned, as well as the crime of joining that group to
achieve the same purposes by the same means that the seventh, eighth, ninth and
tenth appellants condemned. The eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, fifteenth and
sixteenth in it, as well as the crime of providing that group with material and
moral aid, which the first appellant has condemned as well. :-
1 Taking leadership in it, joining it, or
providing it with financial and moral aid .
2 - That the group was founded in violation of the provisions of the law, and the establishment intended here is not to take the procedures of publicizing the group or announcing it, but rather its integration into the entity of the society according to the activity and the legitimate and specific purposes for it, which do not involve violating the law. But if it deviates from the legitimate and legal purposes, it is considered a group Contrary to the provisions of the law .
3- That the aims of that group be to disrupt the provisions of the constitution and the law, to prevent state institutions and public authorities from exercising their functions, to attack the personal freedom of citizens and public rights, and to harm national unity and social peace. The second is moral, which is the criminal intent and is represented in the direction of the offender's will, his awareness of what he is doing, and his knowledge of the conditions of the crime. It is stipulated that the will of the offender is directed to take over the leadership of the group, join it, or provide it with aid, and that he is aware of the goals of the group, its illegal purposes, and the means of implementing those purposes.The will of each of them to commit the act ascribed to him, whether by assuming leadership in the group or joining it, with their knowledge of the illegal purposes of that group and its use of force, violence, threat and intimidation as means to achieve the group's goals, with their knowledge of the matter that fulfills the elements of that crime against them. In this regard, it is not correct.Since that was the case, and what was by the judgment in its blogs, quoting the mentioned lawsuits joining this lawsuit and the ones that attached official copies of them, as well as the American Islamic Dialogue Conference in Qatar and the phone calls that were received by the third accused, were sufficient to explain the content of the evidence derived from it, this counted him in order to be pampered and his judgment would be straightened, and from then negate the judgment claim of shortcomings in this regard. :-
And since it is about the defense shown by the present defense with the seventh, eighth, ninth and eleventh defendants, the fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth appellants, of the unconstitutionality of the decision by Law No. 49 of 2012 in its content of limiting the right to adhere to its effect on a certain period of time and before a certain body and in a specific way, which is the method of grievance in violation of the text Articles 95 and 96 of the current Constitution, it is refuted that the issuance of a decision to pardon the penalty or the issuance of a law if the amnesty is comprehensive is a right guaranteed by the Constitution to the President of the Republic, who exercises it whenever circumstances require it, guided by political considerations and accommodations that he sees in the interest of society. It should be followed when issuing amnesty decisions, and there is no special form in which it is formulated so that it can be said that the amnesty was issued in accordance with the constitution or in violation of it, and therefore the decision by Law No. 89 of 2012 - which was published in the Official Gazette in the number 40 bis on 8-10-2011 - is not taken into account. That he is shortened in his first article the validity of this pardonComprehensive coverage of felonies, misdemeanors and attempts committed with the aim of supporting the revolution and achieving its goals during the period from January 25, 2011 to June 30, 2012, with the exception of felonies of premeditated murder, as the Constitution did not restrict the President of the Republic with any restriction in limiting the amnesty to certain crimes or the period which is covered by the amnesty, which is the matter with which the court considers that this motive is not of a serious nature and there is no need to resolve the dispute regarding it before deciding on the merits of the case. From the 2014 constitution, as they do not support his martyrdom, as Article 45 stipulates that the punishment is personal, and there is no crime or punishment except on the basis of a law, and no punishment is imposed except by a court ruling.Intentional , since the Constitution did not restrict the President of the Republic with a restriction that the amnesty be limited to specific crimes or to the period covered by the amnesty, which is the matter with which the court considers that this motive is not of a serious nature and there is no need to resolve the dispute over it before deciding on the merits of the case. The obituary is without a basis from reality and the law, and in that it does not shame what the defense supports regarding Articles 45 and 96 of the 2014 Constitution, as they do not provide a basis for his martyrdom, as Article 45 stipulates that the Punishment is personal, and there is no crime or punishment except on the basis of a law, nor imposing a penalty except by a court ruling, Intentional, since the Constitution did not restrict the President of the Republic with a restriction that the amnesty be limited to specific crimes or to the period covered by the amnesty, which is the matter with which the court considers that this motive is not of a serious nature and there is no need to resolve the dispute over it before deciding on the merits of the case. The obituary is without a basis from reality and the law, and in that it does not shame what the defense supports regarding Articles 45 and 96 of the 2014 Constitution, as they do not provide a basis for his martyrdom, as Article 45 stipulates that the Punishment is personal, and there is no crime or punishment except on the basis of a law, nor imposing a penalty except by a court ruling,Regarding Articles 45 and 96 of the 2014 Constitution, as they do not support his martyrdom, as Article 45 stipulates that the punishment is personal, and there is no crime or punishment except on the basis of a law, and no punishment is imposed except by a judicial ruling, There is no punishment except for acts subsequent to the date of the law’s entry into force, as stated in Article 96 that the accused is innocent until proven guilty in a fair legal trial, in which he is guaranteed the guarantees of his defense…etc. Payment should be refused.And since it is about the defense made by the seventh, eighth, ninth and eleventh defendants, the fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth appellants, regarding the unconstitutionality of the text of Articles 9 and 46 of the General Intelligence Law No. 100 of 1971 regarding the inadmissibility of intelligence personnel giving statements about their work without the written approval of the Chief of General Intelligence and the departure of this The prohibition to include criminal trials in violation of the provisions of Articles 92, 94, 95, 96, and 97 of the current constitution, so it is clear that the text of Article 3 of Law No. 100 of 1971 regarding the issuance of the General Intelligence Law has been stipulated that the General Intelligence is competent to maintain the safety and security The state and the preservation of the entity of its political system by setting the general policy for security, collecting and examining news, distributing information related to the safety of the state, providing the President of the Republic, the National Defense Council and the Intelligence Authority with all their needs and providing the necessary advice and recommendations. It is also concerned with any additional work assigned to it by the President of the Republic or the Council of Ministers.National defense and it is related to the safety of the country. It was stated in the explanatory memorandum of the General Intelligence Bill that it entrusted the General Intelligence with the task of maintaining the security of the country and preserving its constitutional entity against the continuous attempts of colonialism, imperialism and hostile intelligence services, and if this task is accurate in nature in normal times, it is in In times of war and crises, it is more accurate and dangerous, and from this it is clear that the work entrusted to the General Intelligence is so dangerous and secretive that those in charge of it must have the highest degree of care and caution, and since the head of the General Intelligence - according to the text of Article 9 of the General Intelligence Law - is responsible for securing the intelligence activity. He may take the necessary and appropriate measures for this purpose, and he may not divulge any information at all with the permission of the President of the Republic or the National Defense Council, and if this is the obligation imposed by law on the PresidentGeneral Intelligence, it has required the same commitment to the rules of security and confidentiality on individuals working in the same entity, whether during service or even after its end - which was mentioned in Article 46 of the same law - and added that no party may ask a member of the General Intelligence to make statements about his work Or allow him to make these statements, even after leaving the service of the General Intelligence, unless the head of the General Intelligence agrees in writing, and it is clear from the text of Articles 9 and 46 of Law 100 of 1971 that the legislator has taken into account the seriousness of the work of this body and what its employees have Important information that affects the security and safety of the state. Therefore, organizational controls have been set for its members that restrict the disclosure of any of these secrets, in order to secure the activity of the General Intelligence and preserve information and its sources by giving the Chief of General Intelligence the authorityAfter its completion - which was mentioned in Article 46 of the same law - and he added that no party may ask a General Intelligence member to make statements about his work or allow him to make these statements, even if that is after leaving the service of the General Intelligence, unless approved by the Chief of Intelligence. It is clear from the text of Articles 9 and 46 of Law 100 of 1971 that the legislator has taken into account the seriousness of the work of this body and the important information its employees have that affect the security and safety of the state. The activity of the General Intelligence and the preservation of information and its sources by giving the Chief of General Intelligence the authorityAfter its completion - which was mentioned in Article 46 of the same law - and he added that no party may ask a General Intelligence member to make statements about his work or allow him to make these statements, even if that is after leaving the service of the General Intelligence, unless approved by the Chief of Intelligence. It is clear from the text of Articles 9 and 46 of Law 100 of 1971 that the legislator has taken into account the seriousness of the work of this body and the important information its employees have that affect the security and safety of the state. The activity of the General Intelligence and the preservation of information and its sources by giving the Chief of General Intelligence the authorityIt is clear from the text of Articles 9 and 46 of Law 100 of 1971 that the legislator has taken into account the seriousness of the work of this body and the important information its employees have that affect the security and safety of the state. The activity of the General Intelligence and the preservation of information and its sources by giving the Chief of General Intelligence the authorityIt is clear from the text of Articles 9 and 46 of Law 100 of 1971 that the legislator has taken into account the seriousness of the work of this body and the important information that its employees have that affect the security and safety of the state. The activity of the General Intelligence and the preservation of information and its sources by giving the Chief of General Intelligence the authority This connection is justifiable and sufficient to put it aside, as what he raises about the court's reluctance to this request becomes ill-advised.Since that was the case, and the contested judgment had been presented to the plea by the fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth appellants for the invalidity of the evidence derived from the national security investigations and its annexes, and I put it forward by saying ( and since it is about the defense given by the defense of the seventh, eighth, ninth and eleventh defendants for the invalidity and illegality of the evidence derived from the investigations of the National Security Commission and the attachments attached thereto, due to the defendants' lack of legal or physical possession or possession of the electronic accounts attributed to them, and the absence of evidence of their use, access to them, or their circulation of any messages through them.the judge shall rule in the case according to the belief that he has formed....It is justified to raise that argument, in addition to the fact that since the judgment had correctly concluded that the inspection of the electronic accounts of these appellants was the result of a legitimate and correct procedure in the law, after he was convinced of the soundness Of the investigations conducted by the National Security, he does not have to rely in their conviction on the evidence derived from the examination those accounts, and then there is no place for the obituary on the ruling in this aspect. for what that was. The international Brotherhood and the Hamas charter have an origin from reality that simulates what has been presented and the court reassures him and takes it.In addition to that, it is not impossible or impossible for someone who works in the national security sector and is specialized in following up on the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood to obtain these documents in any form, even through the social networking sites published in them , which is where the payment was contrary to reality and rejected by the court. It is a response from the judgment that is sufficient and justifiable in dismissing that plea, and it was decided that the trial court had the right to assess every evidence presented to it, and it would decide in the manner it is comfortable with in the light of what it hears from the statements of witnesses and what it sees itself. To what the witness of the evidence, Officer Muhammad Mabrouk, drmorydr@gmail.com Because the editor of the national security report exceeded the limits of the assignment decision, and the person who carried out the procedure was one of the secret sources, and it was impossible to access this email technically through the password 2010 zajazij The response is that despite the fact that it is decided that the invalidity of the evidence derived from the inspection may not be challenged due to non-observance of the established legal conditions, except for those whose protection these conditions have been enacted, which was not achieved with regard to the defendant who expressed their defense, the court, despite that, does not stop at this point, but rather, what is confirmed from the investigation report, written by the officer, Muhammad Mabrouk, on January 9, 2011, included that he had received confirmed information from his secret sources, which was confirmed by his investigations, that Brotherhood leaders, members of the Guidance Office, headed by Muhammad Badi' Abd al-Majid, held several meetings on the street. Al-Ikhshid Manial, During which the invitation of youth elements and political context to organize demonstrations was discussed and studied on 25/1/2011 in conjunction with the celebration of Police Day and its suitability for the intervention of the group's elements and cadres to participate in those demonstrations in order to serve its plans and the directions of the international Brotherhood organization that aims to spread chaos in the country and seize power, he added. with investigations, to travel to the state of Turkey to meet with the fugitive Brotherhood Ahmed Abdel-Aty to inform him of the events in Egypt and to study the possibility of the group's investment in it. The author of the report requested permission to follow up the movements of wired and wireless elements to monitor their hostile plans. On January 9, 2011 at 4:30 pm, the Supreme State Security Prosecution gave permission for any of the specialized judicial control officers in the State Security Investigation Agency to monitor the meetings that take place from the three suspects. Muhammad Badi Abd al-Majid, Muhammad Saad al-Katatni, and the deceased Muhammad Morsi al-Ayyat) in public and private places and monitor communications made on their phones whose numbers are included in the attached list and to the crime subject of the permission, drmorydr @armail com using Bath and Word zajazij2011 A message entitled Assessment of a position on the Egyptian situation in the light of the Tunisian revolution. And since it was in the face of the objection raised by the defense, and when it was clear in the first article of Law No. 10 of 2003 regarding the Telecommunications Regulatory Law, which was stipulated as follows, in applying the provisions of this law, the following terms have the meanings set out against each of them. :
1-...,2-...,3-Regulating communications and it was not arbitrary in its implementation together, and therefore it is not valid to argue about that, and the obituary of the ruling in this regard is irrelevant. Since that was, and the second appellant had no interest in what he raised from the defense that the case is not allowed in relation to the accusation of assuming leadership in a group that was founded in violation of the provisions of the law, as long as it is clear that the penalty imposed on him falls within the limits set for any of the two crimes of communicating with a foreign organization and doing dire acts With the independence of the country in which the ruling has proven their availability, the matter with which to prevent him in this regard is unacceptable.As it was evident from the contested judgment that even if he referred in his blogs to cases Nos. 500 of 2008, 1414 of 2008, 404 of 2009, 237 of 2009, 909 of 2010, he limited the security of a supreme state, but he did not rely on anything that came in them, which is what he disclosed. The judgment explicitly declared him when responding to the pleas of the fifth, sixth, seventh and ninth appellants with the invalidity of the evidence derived from them, and this led to the fact that the court had turned away from it and had no influence in its judgment. Hence, their prevention in this regard is incorrect.Since that was the case, and what the eighth and tenth appellants raise about the verdict regarding their conviction for the crime of joining a group that was established in contravention of the provisions of the law, despite the legalization of the group's conditions by Resolution No. 644 of 2013 issued by the Ministry of Insurance and Social Affairs. And back.Since that is the case, and what the eighth appellant raises about the obituary of the contested ruling that the incident occurred before the entry into force of Law No. 8 of 2015 regarding the inclusion of the group among terrorist entities, it is rejected that the texts of Articles 86, 86 bis/1 of the Penal Code stated that the legislator described the organization The terrorist attacks any association, body, organization, group or gang whose purpose is to claim, by any means, to disrupt the provisions of the Constitution or laws, or to prevent a state institution or a public authority from carrying out its work, or to attack the personal freedom of citizens or other freedoms.. .. Or joining one of them with his knowledge of its purposes if it uses terrorism to achieve the purposes it calls for, which means that the association, body, organization or group established in accordance with the provisions of the law remains free from sin as long as it operates within the framework of what it was established for. To disrupt the constitution or laws.According to the above mentioned materials. The accused, Muhyi Hamid Al-Sayed Ahmed, took the apartment located on Ibn Hani Al-Andalusi Street, from Al-Tayaran Street, Nasr City, as a headquarters for holding secret organizational meetings for members of the Brotherhood. And it is not as the defense claims that it is in the property located at No. 17 Al-Moalemeen Street in Zagazig city, and the arrest procedure is sound and clear of any defect, and the court decides to refuse the payment), and what was stated in the judgment was in response to the payment, as mentioned above.Sufficient, justified, and consistent with the correct law, in addition to the fact that these appellants have no interest in arguing about the existence of a state of flagrante delicto that allows them to be arrested and searched or not, as long as the judicial officer has the right to conduct this arrest and search based on the order issued to him by the investigating judge - which was proven by the ruling - In what the aforementioned appellants do not dispute, and therefore the obituary of the contested judgment in this regard is not correct.Since this was, and it was decided that the request that is not directed to denying the act constituting the crime or to the impossibility of the occurrence of the incident as narrated by the witnesses, but rather was intended to raise suspicion in the evidence that the Court was assured of, it is considered an objective defense that the court is not obligated to answer and since the trial court evidence was She was assured of the statements of the witnesses of the and the correctness of their portrayal of the incident, as it is not permissible to confiscate it in her belief and there is no place for mourning over her because she did not respond. The ninth appellant's request to assign the Public Prosecution to provide a certificate for the number of cases in which he was held in pretrial detention and the terms of imprisonment in them,Since that was the case, and the contested judgment had been presented to the defense of the tenth appellant based on his non-affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood and put it forward by saying (...... according to the principle - that the court is convinced of the occurrence of the act constituting it from any evidence or horn presented to it, what the judgment stated. In the context passing his statement, it is considered sufficient and justifiable in his evidence of the existence of the crime of joining a group foundation in violation of the provisions of the law in the case of the tenth appellant and his belonging to that group, and then his prohibition against judging shortcomings in this regard is invalid.Since that was the case, and the verdict had been presented to the defense of the fifteenth appellant stating that his detention in a military area was invalid because of this violation of the law on organizing prisons and the constitution in his saying (that the case papers were devoid of what the defense decided in this regard, and therefore there is no room for the court to address issues that were not officially proven to it, which is what causes the court to refrain from paying).As this was, and it was useless for the fifteenth appellant to detain him in a military area and not to present him to the Public Prosecution within the legally prescribed period - assuming that this is true - as long as he does not claim that this procedure resulted in evidence produced from the evidence of the case, and then His prohibition in this regard is not acceptable. As this was, and what the aforementioned appellant raises about the invalidity of his arrest and the fall of his imprisonment for not renewing him on time in Case No. 921 of 2013 about the escape from Wadi al-Natrun prison, because it was not related to the judiciary of the contested judgment, and therefore it was forbidden in this regard becomes unacceptable.Since that was the case, and the aforementioned appellant's mourning of his conviction of the crime of joining the Muslim Brotherhood, despite what the third appellant decided in the investigations that he does not belong to the group and that the investigation report is empty of evidence indicating His joining it is nothing more than an objective argument in the assessment of the evidence and in the authority of the trial court in weighing the elements of the case And deduce her belief, which may not be raised before the Court of Cassation.Since that was the case, and this appellant lamented that the appealed judgment harmed him when he punished him to the extent of the same penalty imposed on him when he was tried the first time, despite his acquittal of the crime of disclosing a secret of the defense of the country, as the principle that the convicted person may not be harmed by his appeal or his grievance if it is valid in the appeal by way of cassation, then it is not valid to implement it except in terms of the amount of the penalty, which is considered a maximum limit that the second body may not exceed. Rather, it is the same punishment, so it cannot be said that the contested judgment touched or harmed the position of the appellant. And then be prevented in this regard be unacceptable.Since that was the case, and it was clear from the minutes of the last trial session that the defense present with the appellants decided that they had no other requests and the pleading was concluded with a request for acquittal, and therefore the appellants have no right after the court to refuse to hear witnesses whose names were mentioned even if they had requested that in a hearing precedent, because it is decided that the court may dispense with hearing the statements of witnesses if the accused or the defender expressly or implicitly accepts this, without preventing them from being heard before it from relying in its judgment on their statements they made in the investigations as long as these statements are submitted to the court. The table of research, and then the obituary of the verdict of the grocery store,Law. The court decided, in its session 26/5/2019, when examining Case No. 56460 of 2013 Nasr City Felonies, to include it in Case 56458 of 2013 Nasr City Felonies because of the simple connection between them and for each of them to issue an independent ruling. set by law. From all of the foregoing, the plea is the absence of the investigative judge's decision to make a misplaced copy of the papers, which the court rejects. He participates in this response and withdraws from the defenses made by the same accused or other accused because they agreed on the same grounds on which the plea was based, as follows:3- The plea for linking in the current case and case No. 56460 for the year 2013 Felonies of the First City of Nasr, restricted to No. 2926 for the year 2013, East Cairo and restricted to No. 921 for the year 2013, Public Prosecution's communications regarding the first accused, Mohamed Badi' Abdel-Majid Sami, in the referral order in the present case and the accusation received in the third clause of the lawsuit related to the above-mentioned unit of the material act attributed to them in two cases.Since, as previously said, the assessment of the existence of a link between the crimes stipulated in Article 32 of the Penal Code is within the discretionary power of the trial court, which alone has the right to decide what it deems appropriate based on the reasons that would lead to its conclusion. She decided that the two lawsuits should be joined by a simple connection and that an independent judgment be issued in each of them, because this assessment from her is not valid forfeiting her right to it, and the payment is unjustly and must be rejected, 4 -....., 5-.....As the investigative judge did not exclude him from the accusation in the aforementioned case, which was registered with No. 56460 for the year 2013, because the evidence from the papers is that the investigation judge limited his jurisdiction to the facts delegated to it without the unrelated rights facts that he referred to the Public Prosecution for jurisdiction, which does not entail for the accused who they accepted this procedure and did not appeal this order due to lack of jurisdiction as stipulated in Article No. 163 of the Code of Criminal Procedure), and if what the judgment stated - in the foregoing context - was justified, consistent with the correctness of the law, and sufficient to carry its judgment in responding to the sixth and fifteenth pleas of the appellants in this regard. And rejecting them,Since that is the case, and the defense of the lack of connection with the incident is one of the objective defenses that do not deserve a response, as long as the response is based on evidence that the court has reassured and mentioned in its ruling, the obituary of the ruling in this regard is not acceptable. about it is unacceptable.Since this was so, and it was clear from reviewing the contested judgment that he relied on the conviction of the appellants on reasonable and sufficient evidence to carry his judgment, the statements he went on to and which were mentioned by the appellants with the reasons for Their appeal are such as adding after he had fulfilled the evidence of conviction and its meaning, if they were not This digression is needed in the field of inference as long as he established the evidence of the crimes ascribed to them on what he bears, and there was no effect of what he added to the judgment in his logic or the conclusion he reached, and therefore the prevention of the appellants in this regard is not correct.Since that was the case, and the state of wanting to convict the convicts was an internal matter that resides in the judge's soul and is related to his personality and conscience, and the legislator left the matter of estimating the conviction to the judge's estimation and what he is reassuring and comfortable with in his conscience. .Since that was the case, and the court's judgment in another lawsuit against the appellant would not restrict it to anything, and it is in the process of deciding the case in question, and it is not considered among the reasons for the invalidity stipulated in Article 247 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in which it is prohibited for the judge who does one of these The reasons are for him to sit down to decide the case in order to stave off the suspicion that he was influenced by his personal interest or a special connection or an opinion he had previously expressed in the same case in order to preserve the position of the judiciary and the highness of its word in the eyes of the people, and therefore what the appellants raise in this regard has no place.Since that was the case, and the contested judgment was not relied upon in convicting the appellants on evidence derived from the statements of the first appellant in the investigations, there is no point in mourning the judgment in this regard. Since that was the case, and it was decided that the court, in taking the accused's statements, is not obligated to adhere to its text and appearance, but rather to sever it and derive from it the truth from the truth as it revealed it. It is no more than a substantive argument about the authority of the trial court in estimating and fragmenting the evidence of the case, taking from it what you are comfortable with, and excluding everything else that may not be raised before the Court of Cassation.Since that was the case, and it was clear from the records of the contested judgment that the court had seen a copy of the international list of the Brotherhood - contrary to what the appellants allege for the reasons for their appeal - the obituary of the judgment in this regard is unfounded. Since that is the case, and what the appellants are raising about the evidence derived from the international list of the Muslim Brotherhood organization is nothing more than an attempt by them to question the evidence of the case in a certain way, leading to a contradiction of the image that appeared in the conscience of the judge of the matter with the correct evidence, which is not acceptable to raise before Court of Cassation.Because of that, and what the appellants raised about the contradictions of the ruling when he considered that the group's guide in Egypt and its guidance office could not commit these crimes without the approval of the global organization of the group, while Article 50 of the global regulation of the organization on which it was based indicates that the leadership of countries is from It adheres to the decision of the General Guide and the Guidance Office, which is nothing more than an attempt by them to question the evidence of the case in a certain way, leading to a contradiction of the image that appeared in the judge's conscience with the correct evidence, which is not acceptable to raise before the Court of Cassation.Since that was the case, and the trial court had established its judgment on the evidence that it was convinced of, which reverted to a correct origin in the papers, and concluded in a reasonable logic that the accusation was attributed to the appellants, and its judgment in this regard was based on a belief that it settled in its conscience based on certainty and its ruling was not based on Assumption and possibility, according to the appellants, what they raise in this regard is not correct.Since that was the case, and the appealed judgment had offered to argue that the transcription of the conversations was invalid, which was done with the knowledge of Lt. Col. Mohamed Mabrouk because it was obtained without a legal basis, as he transcribed the content of those recordings, altered them and viewed them, and he has no right to everything he did. With what is justified in his dismissal based on the fact that the recording of the conversations that took place in this case is legally authorized conversation, the police officer should not be reprimanded if he listened to the recordeds and transcribed them as long as he saw that This listening is necessary to complete his procedures and he is aware of his case, what the appellant raises The fourteenth in this respect is unorthodox.Since that was the case, and the appealed judgment did not apply Article 17 of the Penal Code against the eighth, tenth, twelfth, fifteenth and sixteenth appellants - contrary to what they claim for the reasons for their appeal - the obituary against him in this regard has no place.Since that was the case, and the penalty for the crime of joining a group that was founded in violation of the law and used terrorism as a means to achieve its goals was rigorous imprisonment in accordance with the text of Articles 86 bis and 86 bis A /2 of the Penal Code, and the contested ruling had been imposed on the penalty for the fifth appellant. The tenth and sixteenth to imprisonment for seven years and then have erred in the application of the law, but since the aforementioned appellants are the two convicted and the Public Prosecution did not appeal this ruling by way of cassation, the Court of Cassation cannot correct this error in which the ruling occurred until No harm in stabbing them. In view of the foregoing, the entire appeal is based on no basis and must be rejected as a matter.
For these reasons
The court ruled: - First: - Accepting the appeal submitted by the appellants in form .
Second: - With the expiration of the criminal case for the appellant, Issam Al-Din Muhammad Hussein Al-Arian, for his death .
Third: Rejecting the appeal submitted by the remaining appellants as a matter of fact.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق